Constitutional Law with Article 16(1)

Supreme Court Denies Notional Financial Benefits Post-Retirement: Government of West Bengal vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16(1), Fundamental Rights, Promotion, Retirement Benefits, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 54(1)(a), West Bengal Service Rules

Supreme Court Denies Notional Financial Benefits Post-Retirement: Government of West Bengal vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee is entitled to notional financial benefits of a promotional post after retirement when the promotion was recommended before retirement but not actually granted due to administrative delays. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Government […]

Supreme Court Denies Notional Financial Benefits Post-Retirement: Government of West Bengal vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of persons with disabilities to scribes in the Civil Services Examination: Vikash Kumar vs. Union Public Service Commission & Ors. (2021) INSC 75 (11 February 2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16(1), Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Reasonable Accommodation, Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 with Section 2(s), Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 with Section 20, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights of Persons with Disabilities to Scribes in Civil Services Exam Date of the Judgment: 11 February 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 75 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J, Indira Banerjee, J, Sanjiv Khanna, J Can a person with a disability, not classified as having a “benchmark disability,” be denied a scribe for

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of persons with disabilities to scribes in the Civil Services Examination: Vikash Kumar vs. Union Public Service Commission & Ors. (2021) INSC 75 (11 February 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies horizontal reservation for OBC women in UP Police Constable Recruitment (2020)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16(1), Constitutional Law with Article 16(4), Fundamental Rights, Horizontal Reservation, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Recruitment, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vertical Reservation

Supreme Court Clarifies Horizontal Reservation for OBC Women in UP Police Constable Recruitment LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of horizontal reservation in public employment. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Recruitment. Case Name: Saurav Yadav & Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Judgment Date: 18 December 2020 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 18 December 2020 Citation: (2020)

Supreme Court clarifies horizontal reservation for OBC women in UP Police Constable Recruitment (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles reservation in promotions for persons with disabilities: Siddaraju vs. State of Karnataka (2020) INSC 26 (14 January 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16(1), Constitutional Law with Article 16(4), Judges, Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 with Section 33, R.F. Nariman, Reservation in Promotions, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Reservation in Promotions for Persons with Disabilities Date of the Judgment: 14 January 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 26 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J., Aniruddha Bose, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can persons with disabilities be given reservation in promotions? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question, clarifying the extent of reservation for

Supreme Court settles reservation in promotions for persons with disabilities: Siddaraju vs. State of Karnataka (2020) INSC 26 (14 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the application of the ‘catch-up’ rule in promotions for reserved categories: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure vs. Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende & Ors (2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16(1), Constitutional Law with Article 16(4A), Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Promotions and Seniority, Service Law, Service Law with Maharashtra Civil Services (Regulation of Seniority) Rules 1982, Service Law with Reservation Act 2004

Supreme Court Clarifies Catch-Up Rule and Seniority in Promotions for Reserved Categories: Sudhakar vs. Noreshwar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the ‘catch-up’ rule applies to promotions of reserved category candidates and their seniority in higher posts. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Promotions and Seniority) Case Name: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure vs. Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende & Ors [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court clarifies the application of the ‘catch-up’ rule in promotions for reserved categories: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure vs. Noreshwar Raghunathrao Shende & Ors (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top