Constitutional Law with Article 21

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence Due to Mercy Petition Delay: Jagdish vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (21 February 2019)

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence Due to Mercy Petition Delay: Jagdish vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether inordinate delay in deciding a mercy petition warrants commutation of a death sentence to life imprisonment. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Jagdish vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Judgment Date: 21 February 2019 Date of the […]

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence Due to Mercy Petition Delay: Jagdish vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (21 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Timely Appointment of Information Commissioners for Effective RTI Implementation

Supreme Court Directs Timely Appointment of Information Commissioners for Effective RTI Implementation LEGAL ISSUE: Ensuring the effective implementation of the Right to Information Act, 2005 through timely appointments to the Central and State Information Commissions. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the Right to Information. Case Name: Anjali Bhardwaj and Others vs. Union of

Supreme Court Directs Timely Appointment of Information Commissioners for Effective RTI Implementation Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Gruesome Murder Case: Md. Mannan vs. State of Bihar (2019)

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Gruesome Murder Case: Md. Mannan vs. State of Bihar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a death sentence should be commuted to life imprisonment when there are mitigating circumstances and procedural lapses in the sentencing process. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Md. Mannan @ Abdul Mannan v. State of Bihar Judgment

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Gruesome Murder Case: Md. Mannan vs. State of Bihar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Penalty in Rape and Murder Case: Raju Jagdish Paswan vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

Supreme Court Commutes Death Penalty in Rape and Murder Case: Raju Jagdish Paswan vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Date of the Judgment: January 17, 2019 Citation: Raju Jagdish Paswan v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appeal Nos. 88-89 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos.5422-5423 of 2013) Judges: S.A. Bobde, J., L. Nageswara Rao, J.,

Supreme Court Commutes Death Penalty in Rape and Murder Case: Raju Jagdish Paswan vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rights of death row prisoners regarding facilities and treatment: In Re: Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons (2018)

Rights of Death Row Prisoners: Supreme Court Clarifies Entitlements (2018) Date of the Judgment: December 13, 2018 Citation: I.A. NO. 26542 OF 2018 in WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 406 OF 2013 Judges: Madan B. Lokur, J, S. Abdul Nazeer, J, Deepak Gupta, J Can a prisoner sentenced to death be treated differently from other convicts?

Supreme Court clarifies rights of death row prisoners regarding facilities and treatment: In Re: Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Recovery Order in Custodial Death Case: Amol Vitthalrao Kadu vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) INSC 1000 (10 December 2018)

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Recovery Order in Custodial Death Case Date of the Judgment: 10 December 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 1000 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and R. Subhash Reddy, J. Can an investigating officer be immediately held liable to pay compensation in a case of custodial death, even before their liability is determined? The

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Recovery Order in Custodial Death Case: Amol Vitthalrao Kadu vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) INSC 1000 (10 December 2018) Read Post »

Witness Protection Scheme Mandated Nationwide by Supreme Court: Mahender Chawla & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (05 December 2018)

Supreme Court Mandates Witness Protection Scheme Nationwide Date of the Judgment: 05 December 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: A.K. Sikri, J. and S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can the criminal justice system function effectively when witnesses are afraid to testify? The Supreme Court of India, in a landmark judgment, addressed this critical question by mandating a

Witness Protection Scheme Mandated Nationwide by Supreme Court: Mahender Chawla & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (05 December 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Chhattisgarh Murder Case: Chhannu Lal Verma vs. State of Chhattisgarh (28 November 2018)

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Chhattisgarh Murder Case: Chhannu Lal Verma vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the death penalty imposed on the appellant was justified under the “rarest of rare” doctrine. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Chhannu Lal Verma vs. The State of Chhattisgarh [Judgment Date]: 28 November 2018 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence in Chhattisgarh Murder Case: Chhannu Lal Verma vs. State of Chhattisgarh (28 November 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Regulates Firecracker Sales to Curb Pollution: Arjun Gopal vs. Union of India (23 October 2018)

Supreme Court Regulates Firecracker Sales to Curb Pollution: Arjun Gopal vs. Union of India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Balancing the right to a healthy environment with the right to trade and religious practices during festivals, specifically concerning the use of firecrackers. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (Environmental Law) Case Name: Arjun Gopal and Others vs. Union

Supreme Court Regulates Firecracker Sales to Curb Pollution: Arjun Gopal vs. Union of India (23 October 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Decriminalizes Adultery: Landmark Judgment on Section 497 IPC and Section 198 CrPC (27 September 2018)

Supreme Court Decriminalizes Adultery: Joseph Shine vs. Union of India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalizes adultery, and Section 198 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which deals with the procedure for filing a complaint, are constitutionally valid. CASE TYPE: Criminal, Constitutional Law Case Name: Joseph Shine vs.

Supreme Court Decriminalizes Adultery: Landmark Judgment on Section 497 IPC and Section 198 CrPC (27 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Live Streaming of Proceedings for Public Access: Swapnil Tripathi vs. Supreme Court of India (2018) INSC 784 (26 September 2018)

Supreme Court Allows Live Streaming of Proceedings for Public Access Date of the Judgment: 26 September 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 784 Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J, Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J Can the public have real-time access to court proceedings? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question, paving the way

Supreme Court Allows Live Streaming of Proceedings for Public Access: Swapnil Tripathi vs. Supreme Court of India (2018) INSC 784 (26 September 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top