Constitutional Law with Article 226

Supreme Court Upholds Power to Reject Misaligned Bids in Electricity Procurement: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 63, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(b)

Supreme Court Upholds Power to Reject Misaligned Bids in Electricity Procurement: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State Electricity Regulatory Commission can reject a bid for electricity procurement if the quoted tariff is not aligned with prevailing market prices, even after a transparent bidding process. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Power to Reject Misaligned Bids in Electricity Procurement: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns AFT order on policy formation for JAG (Air) promotion: Union of India vs. NK Sharma (2023)

/ Armed Forces Tribunal, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Separation of Powers, Service Law, Service Law with Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, Service Law with Section 27 of the Air Force Act, 1950

Supreme Court overturns AFT order on policy formation for JAG (Air) promotion: Union of India vs. NK Sharma (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) can direct the government to formulate a specific policy for promotions. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Armed Forces) Case Name: Union of India & Ors vs. Air Commodore NK

Supreme Court overturns AFT order on policy formation for JAG (Air) promotion: Union of India vs. NK Sharma (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Property Dispute: Pankaj Kumar Tiwari vs. Indian Overseas Bank (2023)

/ Banking Law, Banking Law with Section 14, Civil Law, Civil Law with Order XL, Rule 1, Civil Law with Order XLIII, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Property Dispute: Pankaj Kumar Tiwari vs. Indian Overseas Bank (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can entertain a writ petition challenging a civil court order when a statutory remedy is available. CASE TYPE: Civil. Case Name: Pankaj Kumar Tiwari vs. Indian Overseas Bank Asset Recovery Management

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Property Dispute: Pankaj Kumar Tiwari vs. Indian Overseas Bank (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner to High Court in Insurance Claim Dispute: Universal Sompo vs. Suresh Chand Jain (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 21, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 23, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 58, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 67

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner to High Court in Insurance Claim Dispute: Universal Sompo vs. Suresh Chand Jain (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution is maintainable directly against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) passed in appellate jurisdiction. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner to High Court in Insurance Claim Dispute: Universal Sompo vs. Suresh Chand Jain (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies liability for electricity dues of previous owners on auction purchasers: K C Ninan vs. Kerala State Electricity Board (2023) INSC 478 (19 May 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 43, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 50, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 56, Hima Kohli, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Clarifies Electricity Dues Liability for Auction Purchasers Date of the Judgment: 19 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 478 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Hima Kohli, J, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can auction purchasers be held liable for the unpaid electricity dues of previous owners? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial

Supreme Court clarifies liability for electricity dues of previous owners on auction purchasers: K C Ninan vs. Kerala State Electricity Board (2023) INSC 478 (19 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies liability for electricity dues of previous owners on auction purchasers (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Electricity Act 2003, Electricity Act 2003 with Section 43, Electricity Act 2003 with Section 56, Electricity Supply Code, Hima Kohli, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Clarifies Electricity Dues Liability for Auction Purchasers Date of the Judgment: May 19, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 560 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Hima Kohli, J, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J Can an auction purchaser be held liable for the unpaid electricity dues of the previous owner of a property? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court clarifies liability for electricity dues of previous owners on auction purchasers (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rights of candidates on additional lists in teacher recruitment: State of Karnataka vs. Smt. Bharathi S. (2023) INSC 472 (19 May 2023)

/ Additional List, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Karnataka Education Department Services (Department of Public Instructions) (Recruitment) Rules, 1967, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Recruitment Rules, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights of Candidates on Additional Lists in Teacher Recruitment Date of the Judgment: 19 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 472 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J Can a candidate on a waitlist demand appointment if a vacancy arises after the validity of the waitlist expires? The Supreme

Supreme Court clarifies rights of candidates on additional lists in teacher recruitment: State of Karnataka vs. Smt. Bharathi S. (2023) INSC 472 (19 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rights of candidates in waitlists: State of Karnataka vs. Smt. Bharathi S. (2023)

/ Appointment, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Karnataka Education Department Services (Department of Public Instructions) (Recruitment) Rules, 1967, Karnataka Education Department Services (Department of Public Instructions) (Recruitment) Rules, 1967 with Entry 66, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Recruitment Rules, Service Law, Waitlist

Supreme Court clarifies rights of candidates in waitlists: State of Karnataka vs. Smt. Bharathi S. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether inclusion in a waitlist (Additional List) creates a right to appointment. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Karnataka & Ors. vs. Smt. Bharathi S. Judgment Date: May 19, 2023 Date of the Judgment: May

Supreme Court clarifies rights of candidates in waitlists: State of Karnataka vs. Smt. Bharathi S. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action in Tender Tampering Case: Indian Oil Corporation vs. Ajit Kumar Singh (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Judicial Review, Rajesh Bindal, Service Law, Tender Tampering

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action in Tender Tampering Case: Indian Oil Corporation vs. Ajit Kumar Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Indian Oil Corporation & Ors. vs. Ajit Kumar Singh & Anr. Judgment Date: 17 May 2023 Date of the Judgment: 17 May

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action in Tender Tampering Case: Indian Oil Corporation vs. Ajit Kumar Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Concern on Dereliction of Duty in Criminal Investigation: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, Krishna Murari, Police Investigation

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Concern on Dereliction of Duty in Criminal Investigation: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can comment on lapses in investigation while hearing a bail application. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sanjay Dubey vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Another Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Concern on Dereliction of Duty in Criminal Investigation: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Power to Address Lapses in Investigation During Bail Proceedings: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Bail, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, Krishna Murari

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Power to Address Lapses in Investigation During Bail Proceedings: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court, while hearing a bail application, can take cognizance of lapses in the investigation process and issue directions for departmental inquiry. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sanjay Dubey

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Power to Address Lapses in Investigation During Bail Proceedings: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale Over Prior Agreement: Vikram Kumar vs. State Bank of Hyderabad (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M.R. Shah, SARFAESI Act, 2002, SARFAESI Act, 2002 with Section 13, SARFAESI Act, 2002 with Section 13(8), SARFAESI Act, 2002 with Section 17

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale Over Prior Agreement: Vikram Kumar vs. State Bank of Hyderabad (2023) Date of the Judgment: May 2, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 3152-3153 of 2023 (@ SLP (Civil) Nos. 5973-5974 of 2018) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a prior agreement to sell a property override a

Supreme Court Upholds Auction Sale Over Prior Agreement: Vikram Kumar vs. State Bank of Hyderabad (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top