Constitutional Law with Article 226

Supreme Court settles pensionable service calculation after resignation withdrawal in service law: Bhartiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor vs. State of Gujarat (27 February 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Pensionable Service, Service Law, Service Law with Resignation

Supreme Court Rules on Pensionable Service After Resignation Withdrawal: Bhartiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor vs. State of Gujarat (2023) Date of the Judgment: 27 February 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No 24 of 2013 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J, J B Pardiwala, J. Can a government employee be denied full pension benefits if […]

Supreme Court settles pensionable service calculation after resignation withdrawal in service law: Bhartiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor vs. State of Gujarat (27 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Involving Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (24 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Further Investigation, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 326, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 367, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Involving Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can deny further investigation in a criminal case where the initial investigation was allegedly biased and incomplete, even after a charge sheet has been filed and charges have been framed. CASE

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Involving Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Constable for Misconduct: CISF vs. Santosh Kumar Pandey (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Disciplinary Proceedings, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Judicial Review, Misconduct, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law

CISF vs. Santosh Kumar Pandey: Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Misconduct Date of the Judgment: December 16, 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 8671 of 2015 Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, J. and J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can a disciplinary authority’s decision to dismiss an employee be overturned by a High Court based on a re-evaluation of evidence? The

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Constable for Misconduct: CISF vs. Santosh Kumar Pandey (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Nagpur Metro Rail Project Land Allotment: Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs. Orbit Motels and Inns Private Limited (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978, Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978 with Section 39

Supreme Court Upholds Nagpur Metro Rail Project Land Allotment: Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs. Orbit Motels and Inns Private Limited (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can order the removal of a public project from land allotted to it, when the allottee is in possession and the previous lessee’s title is unclear due

Supreme Court Upholds Nagpur Metro Rail Project Land Allotment: Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs. Orbit Motels and Inns Private Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Raw Material” Definition in Steel Manufacturing: State of Jharkhand vs. Linde India Ltd. (2 December 2022)

/ Bihar Finance Act, 1981, Bihar Finance Act, 1981 with Section 13(1)(b), Bihar Finance Act, 1981 with Section 6, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies “Raw Material” Definition in Steel Manufacturing: State of Jharkhand vs. Linde India Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether oxygen gas used in steel manufacturing qualifies as a “raw material” for concessional tax rates. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: State of Jharkhand and others vs. Linde India Limited and Another Judgment Date: 2

Supreme Court Clarifies “Raw Material” Definition in Steel Manufacturing: State of Jharkhand vs. Linde India Ltd. (2 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs High Court to Re-examine the Issue of Fake Pharmacists: Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar (29 November 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M. R. Shah, M.M. Sundresh, Pharmacy Act, 1948, Pharmacy Law, Pharmacy Practice Regulations, 2015

Supreme Court directs High Court to Re-examine the Issue of Fake Pharmacists: Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in disposing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the operation of hospitals and medical stores by unregistered or fake pharmacists. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Pharmacy Law Case

Supreme Court directs High Court to Re-examine the Issue of Fake Pharmacists: Mukesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar (29 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Negligence in CISF: Union of India vs. Subrata Nath (23 November 2022)

/ Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001, Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 2001 with Rule 32, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli, Judges

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Negligence in CISF: Union of India vs. Subrata Nath (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the Disciplinary Authority in a departmental inquiry. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Union of India and Others vs. Subrata Nath Judgment Date: 23

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Negligence in CISF: Union of India vs. Subrata Nath (23 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Decision on B.Ed. College Recognition: State of Uttarakhand vs. Nalanda College of Education (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 with Rule 7(5), NCTE Regulations, 2014

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Decision on B.Ed. College Recognition: State of Uttarakhand vs. Nalanda College of Education (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a State Government can refuse recognition to new B.Ed. colleges based on the grounds of potential unemployment among graduates. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: The State of Uttarakhand vs. Nalanda College

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Decision on B.Ed. College Recognition: State of Uttarakhand vs. Nalanda College of Education (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disallows Re-evaluation of Answer Scripts in Absence of Rules: Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences vs. Dr. Yerra Trinadh (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Education Law, Examination Law, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Re-evaluation of Answer Scripts

Supreme Court Disallows Re-evaluation of Answer Scripts in Absence of Rules: Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences vs. Dr. Yerra Trinadh (2022) Date of the Judgment: November 4, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1173 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a High Court order the re-evaluation of answer scripts when the relevant rules

Supreme Court Disallows Re-evaluation of Answer Scripts in Absence of Rules: Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences vs. Dr. Yerra Trinadh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the issue of extension of time under One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme in banking cases: State Bank of India vs. Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 990 (04 November 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Act, 1872, Contract Act, 1872 with Section 62, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court on OTS Scheme: No Extension as a Right Date of the Judgment: 04 November 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 990 Judges: Justice M.R. Shah and Justice Krishna Murari Can a borrower demand an extension of time to repay a loan under a One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme as a matter of right? The Supreme

Supreme Court settles the issue of extension of time under One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme in banking cases: State Bank of India vs. Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 990 (04 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the maintainability of writ petitions in tax matters when statutory remedy exists: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. M/s Commercial Engineers (2022) INSC 910 (14 October 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002, Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002 with Section 14, Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002 with Section 46(1)

Supreme Court on Writ Petition Maintainability in Tax Matters: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. M/s Commercial Engineers Date of the Judgment: 14 October 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 910 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can a High Court entertain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India when a statutory remedy

Supreme Court settles the maintainability of writ petitions in tax matters when statutory remedy exists: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. M/s Commercial Engineers (2022) INSC 910 (14 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Tax Assessment Dispute: State of Maharashtra vs. Greatship (India) Limited (20 September 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, Tax Law

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Tax Assessment Dispute: State of Maharashtra vs. Greatship (India) Limited (20 September 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can entertain a writ petition against an assessment order when a statutory remedy of appeal is available. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: The State of Maharashtra and Others vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Tax Assessment Dispute: State of Maharashtra vs. Greatship (India) Limited (20 September 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top