Constitutional Law with Article 227

Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025)

/ Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Supervisory Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: The extent of High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution in arbitration matters. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. [Judgment […]

Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes High Court’s directions on bail order format: Ayub Khan vs. State of Rajasthan (2024) INSC 994 (17 December 2024)

/ Arms Act, 1959, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 3, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 3/25, Arms Act, 1959 with Section 5/25, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Criminal Procedure Code, Criminal Procedure Code with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Offences Against Human Body

Supreme Court quashes High Court’s directions on bail order format: Ayub Khan vs. State of Rajasthan (2024) INSC 994 (17 December 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether High Courts can mandate a specific format for trial courts while deciding bail applications. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Ayub Khan vs. The State of Rajasthan [Judgment Date]: 17 December

Supreme Court quashes High Court’s directions on bail order format: Ayub Khan vs. State of Rajasthan (2024) INSC 994 (17 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rights of temporary employees in State of Odisha vs. Dilip Kumar Mohapatra (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Reinstatement, Service Law, Temporary Employees Rights

Supreme Court clarifies rights of temporary employees in State of Odisha vs. Dilip Kumar Mohapatra (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around the rights of temporary employees and whether they are entitled to reinstatement upon termination, especially when similarly situated individuals have been reinstated. CASE TYPE: This case falls under Service Law, specifically

Supreme Court clarifies rights of temporary employees in State of Odisha vs. Dilip Kumar Mohapatra (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court expunges remarks against Additional District Judge in Delhi judicial service: Sonu Agnihotri vs. Chandra Shekhar & Ors. (2024) INSC 888 (22 November 2024)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 41A, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Constitution of India, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 177, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 380, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 411

Supreme Court expunges remarks against Additional District Judge in Delhi judicial service: Sonu Agnihotri vs. Chandra Shekhar & Ors. (2024) INSC 888 (22 November 2024) Date of the Judgment: 22 November 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 888 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J., Augustine George Masih, J. Can a High Court make adverse remarks

Supreme Court expunges remarks against Additional District Judge in Delhi judicial service: Sonu Agnihotri vs. Chandra Shekhar & Ors. (2024) INSC 888 (22 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Delay Condonation in Land Dispute: Union of India vs. Jahangir Byramji Jeejeebhoy (2024)

/ Civil Law, Condonation of Delay, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Limitation Act

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Delay Condonation in Land Dispute: Union of India vs. Jahangir Byramji Jeejeebhoy (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay of 12 years and 158 days in filing a restoration application can be condoned based on the merits of the case alone, especially when the applicant is unwilling to comply

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Delay Condonation in Land Dispute: Union of India vs. Jahangir Byramji Jeejeebhoy (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies definition of “Workman” under Industrial Disputes Act: Bharti Airtel vs. A.S. Raghavendra (2024)

/ Constitution of India, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Definition of Workman, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 2(s)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Workman” Definition Under Industrial Disputes Act: Bharti Airtel vs. A.S. Raghavendra (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee in a managerial role, but without the power to hire or fire, qualifies as a “workman” under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: M/s Bharti Airtel Limited vs. A.S. Raghavendra

Supreme Court clarifies definition of “Workman” under Industrial Disputes Act: Bharti Airtel vs. A.S. Raghavendra (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Power in Town Planning, Overturns NGT Orders: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Yogendera Mohan Sengupta (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Constitutional Law with Article 300A, Environmental Law, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Himachal Pradesh Town & Country Planning Act, 1977, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, Town and Country Planning Law, Town and Country Planning Law with Section 18, Town and Country Planning Law with Section 20

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Power in Town Planning, Overturns NGT Orders: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Yogendera Mohan Sengupta (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) can direct a state government on how to exercise its legislative powers in town planning. CASE TYPE: Town and Country Planning Law, Environmental Law Case Name: State

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Power in Town Planning, Overturns NGT Orders: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Yogendera Mohan Sengupta (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Expeditious Trial of Criminal Cases Against MPs and MLAs (2023) INSC 991

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 321, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Criminal Procedure, Disqualification of Elected Representatives, Fundamental Rights, Representation of the People Act, 1951, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 8

Supreme Court Directs Expeditious Trial of Criminal Cases Against MPs and MLAs (2023) INSC 991 LEGAL ISSUE: Monitoring and expediting criminal trials against sitting and former Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs). CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (Criminal) Case Name: Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs. Union of India & Anr. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Directs Expeditious Trial of Criminal Cases Against MPs and MLAs (2023) INSC 991 Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner to High Court in Insurance Claim Dispute: Universal Sompo vs. Suresh Chand Jain (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 21, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 23, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 58, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 67

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner to High Court in Insurance Claim Dispute: Universal Sompo vs. Suresh Chand Jain (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution is maintainable directly against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) passed in appellate jurisdiction. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner to High Court in Insurance Claim Dispute: Universal Sompo vs. Suresh Chand Jain (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Concern on Dereliction of Duty in Criminal Investigation: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, Krishna Murari, Police Investigation

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Concern on Dereliction of Duty in Criminal Investigation: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can comment on lapses in investigation while hearing a bail application. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sanjay Dubey vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Another Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Concern on Dereliction of Duty in Criminal Investigation: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Power to Address Lapses in Investigation During Bail Proceedings: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Bail, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, Krishna Murari

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Power to Address Lapses in Investigation During Bail Proceedings: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court, while hearing a bail application, can take cognizance of lapses in the investigation process and issue directions for departmental inquiry. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Sanjay Dubey

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Power to Address Lapses in Investigation During Bail Proceedings: Sanjay Dubey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Late Rent Payment Under Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Act: K. Chinnammal vs. L.R. Eknath (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Eviction of Tenants, Judges, Krishna Murari, Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955, Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 with Section 3, Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 with Section 4

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Late Rent Payment Under Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Act: K. Chinnammal vs. L.R. Eknath (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant can be evicted for failing to pay rent within the stipulated time despite a subsequent deposit, under the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955. CASE TYPE: Landlord-Tenant Dispute, Eviction,

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Late Rent Payment Under Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Act: K. Chinnammal vs. L.R. Eknath (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top