Constitutional Law with Article 227

Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants: Supreme Court clarifies the scope of the Public Premises Act in Dena Bank vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 26, 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha, Cyriac Joseph, JJ. Can a license be revoked, and can a party be evicted from public premises based on the grounds of unauthorized occupation? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a dispute between Dena Bank and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi concerning the eviction […]

Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants: Supreme Court clarifies the scope of the Public Premises Act in Dena Bank vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal in Cases Involving Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution: Shahu Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs. Lata P. Kore (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 23, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. When can a higher court hear an appeal against a lower court’s decision if the original case involved multiple parts of the Indian Constitution? The Supreme Court of India addressed this important question in the case of Shahu

Supreme Court Clarifies Maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal in Cases Involving Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution: Shahu Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs. Lata P. Kore (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Bona Fide Business Needs: Shamshad Ahmad vs. Tilak Raj Bajaj (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Judges: C.K. Thakker, Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a landlord evict a long-term tenant to start a new business for a retired family member? This question was at the heart of a dispute between landlords and tenants in Dehradun. The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Bona Fide Business Needs: Shamshad Ahmad vs. Tilak Raj Bajaj (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of orders regarding Mahantship succession: Mahant Rajendra Das Vaishanav vs. Gopal Das & Ors. (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 04, 2008 Citation: [Citation not available in the provided text] Judges: Justice R.V. Raveendran, Justice Dalveer Bhandari Can previous orders of the Supreme Court be interpreted as final directives on the succession of a religious office, even without a formal adjudication? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of orders regarding Mahantship succession: Mahant Rajendra Das Vaishanav vs. Gopal Das & Ors. (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top