Constitutional Law with Article 243-O

Supreme Court Orders Recount in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute: Vijay Bahadur vs. Sunil Kumar (2025)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 243-O, Judges, Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, Sanjay Karol, U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 with Section 12-C

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 6, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 332 Judges: Sanjay Karol, J., Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has addressed the critical issue of electoral integrity in local governance. The question before the Court was whether a recount of votes should be ordered in […]

Supreme Court Orders Recount in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute: Vijay Bahadur vs. Sunil Kumar (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Disqualification for Not Filing Election Expenses: Laxmibai vs. The Collector, Nanded (2020)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 243-O, Dinesh Maheshwari, Disqualification by State Election Commission, Disqualification by State Election Commission, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 with Section 13, Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 with Section 14B, Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 with Section 15B

Supreme Court clarifies Disqualification for Not Filing Election Expenses: Laxmibai vs. The Collector, Nanded (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the disqualification for not submitting election expenses should be for the maximum period of five years. CASE TYPE: Election Law Case Name: Laxmibai vs. The Collector, Nanded & Ors. Judgment Date: 14 February 2020 Date of the

Supreme Court clarifies Disqualification for Not Filing Election Expenses: Laxmibai vs. The Collector, Nanded (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top