Constitutional Law with Article 32

Supreme Court settles the maintainability of writ petition challenging the decision of Ethics Committee: Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh vs. Bihar Legislative Council (2025) INSC 264 (25 February 2025)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 212(1), Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, Representation of the People Act, 1951, Representation of the People Act, 1951 with Section 151A, Surya Kant

Date of the Judgment: 25 February 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 264 Judges: Surya Kant, J., Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. Can a legislative body’s decision to expel a member be challenged in court? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh vs. Bihar Legislative Council. The court […]

Supreme Court settles the maintainability of writ petition challenging the decision of Ethics Committee: Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh vs. Bihar Legislative Council (2025) INSC 264 (25 February 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Bombay High Court Order on Land Encroachment: Vimal Babu Dhumadiya vs. State of Maharashtra (2025)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Sandeep Mehta, Sanjay Karol, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Bombay High Court Order on Land Encroachment: Vimal Babu Dhumadiya vs. State of Maharashtra (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can declare a High Court judgment illegal under Article 32 of the Constitution, and what remedies are available to parties not heard in the original proceedings. CASE TYPE: Constitutional

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Bombay High Court Order on Land Encroachment: Vimal Babu Dhumadiya vs. State of Maharashtra (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of miscellaneous applications in disposed of cases: Ajay Kumar Jain vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) INSC 958 (09 December 2024)

/ Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Functus Officio, Fundamental Rights, Miscellaneous Application

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of miscellaneous applications in disposed of cases: Ajay Kumar Jain vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) INSC 958 (09 December 2024) Date of the Judgment: 09 December 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 958 Judges: Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan Can a litigant file a miscellaneous application in a case that

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of miscellaneous applications in disposed of cases: Ajay Kumar Jain vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) INSC 958 (09 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe in Political Vendetta Case: Kabir Shankar Bose vs. State of West Bengal (2024)

/ Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Criminal Law, Fair Investigation, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 307, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 341, Offences Against Human Body, Transfer of Investigation

Supreme Court Transfers Investigation to CBI in Political Rivalry Case: Kabir Shankar Bose vs. State of West Bengal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the investigation of a criminal case should be transferred to an independent agency due to allegations of political bias and potential unfairness. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Kabir Shankar Bose vs. State of

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe in Political Vendetta Case: Kabir Shankar Bose vs. State of West Bengal (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets guidelines for property demolitions in criminal cases: In Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures (2024) INSC 866 (13 November 2024)

/ Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Doctrine of Public Trust, Fundamental Rights, Natural Justice, Rule of Law

Supreme Court Guidelines on Property Demolitions in Criminal Cases (2024) Date of the Judgment: 13 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 866 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and K.V. Viswanathan, J. Can the government demolish the homes of people accused of crimes? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this crucial question, emphasizing the importance of due

Supreme Court sets guidelines for property demolitions in criminal cases: In Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures (2024) INSC 866 (13 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Quashing of POCSO FIR Based on Compromise: Ramji Lal Bairwa vs. State of Rajasthan (2024)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 372, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 354A, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 509, Offences Against Women, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 with Section 7, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 with Section 8, Sexual Assault

Supreme Court Sets Aside Quashing of POCSO FIR Based on Compromise: Ramji Lal Bairwa vs. State of Rajasthan (2024) Date of the Judgment: November 7, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 846 Judges: C.T. Ravikumar, J. and Sanjay Kumar, J. Can a criminal case involving sexual assault on a minor be quashed based on a compromise between

Supreme Court Sets Aside Quashing of POCSO FIR Based on Compromise: Ramji Lal Bairwa vs. State of Rajasthan (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Civil Judge Exam Results: Sonal Gupta vs. Registrar General (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Evaluation Process, Examination, Recruitment, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Civil Judge Exam Results: Sonal Gupta vs. Registrar General (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether there was any arbitrary variation in the marks obtained by candidates in the language examination which may affect the integrity of the overall results of the examination. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Sonal Gupta & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Civil Judge Exam Results: Sonal Gupta vs. Registrar General (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Ensures Free Legal Aid Access for Prisoners: Suhas Chakma vs. Union of India (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Directive Principles of State Policy, Fundamental Rights, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 12, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 13, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 with Section 3

Supreme Court Ensures Free Legal Aid Access for Prisoners: Suhas Chakma vs. Union of India (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Ensuring access to free legal aid for prisoners. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Constitutional Law Case Name: Suhas Chakma vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 23rd October 2024 Date of the Judgment: 23rd October 2024

Supreme Court Ensures Free Legal Aid Access for Prisoners: Suhas Chakma vs. Union of India (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Strengthens Measures Against Child Marriage: Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action vs. Union of India (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 with Child Marriage Prohibition Officers, Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 with Implementation

Supreme Court Strengthens Measures Against Child Marriage: Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action vs. Union of India (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Measures to prevent and address child marriage in India. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 18 October 2024

Supreme Court Strengthens Measures Against Child Marriage: Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action vs. Union of India (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Order on FIR Quashing: Gagan Banga vs. State of West Bengal (2024)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Inherent Powers of High Court

Supreme Court Modifies Order on FIR Quashing: Gagan Banga vs. State of West Bengal (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of an order passed by the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: Gagan Banga and another vs. The State of West Bengal and others Judgment Date: September 23, 2024 Date of the Judgment: September

Supreme Court Modifies Order on FIR Quashing: Gagan Banga vs. State of West Bengal (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs petitioners to High Court regarding Border Tax: Muthyala Sunil Kumar vs. Union of India (2024)

/ All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules, 2023, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Motor Vehicles Act, Writ Jurisdiction

Supreme Court directs petitioners to High Court regarding Border Tax: Muthyala Sunil Kumar vs. Union of India (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether State Governments can levy and collect Border Tax/Authorization Fee on vehicles with All India Tourist Permits despite the All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules, 2023. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Writ Petition Case Name: Muthyala

Supreme Court directs petitioners to High Court regarding Border Tax: Muthyala Sunil Kumar vs. Union of India (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Sections 95-100 of IBC: Dilip B Jiwrajka vs. Union of India (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Insolvency Law, Insolvency Law with Section 100, Insolvency Law with Section 95, Insolvency Resolution Process

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Sections 95-100 of IBC: Dilip B Jiwrajka vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Constitutional validity of the process for initiating insolvency resolution for personal guarantors under Sections 95-100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). CASE TYPE: Insolvency Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: Dilip B Jiwrajka vs. Union

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Sections 95-100 of IBC: Dilip B Jiwrajka vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top