Constitutional Law with Article 32

Supreme Court sets aside DPC for Assistant Registrar post due to uncommunicated ACRs: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (24 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Judges, M.R. Shah, Promotion, Service Law, Service Law with Rules 1967, Service Law with Rules 2020

Supreme Court sets aside DPC for Assistant Registrar post due to uncommunicated ACRs: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether uncommunicated Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) can be considered for promotion. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur Judgment Date: 24 February 2023 Date […]

Supreme Court sets aside DPC for Assistant Registrar post due to uncommunicated ACRs: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Involving Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (24 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Further Investigation, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 326, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 367, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Involving Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can deny further investigation in a criminal case where the initial investigation was allegedly biased and incomplete, even after a charge sheet has been filed and charges have been framed. CASE

Supreme Court Orders Further Investigation in Assault Case Involving Minister: Anant Thanur Karmuse vs. State of Maharashtra (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes DPC for Assistant Registrar Post: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC), Judges, M.R. Shah, Promotion, Service Law, Service Law with Annual Confidential Report (ACR)

Supreme Court Quashes DPC for Assistant Registrar Post: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether uncommunicated Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and ACRs communicated just before a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meeting can be considered for promotion. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur

Supreme Court Quashes DPC for Assistant Registrar Post: R.K. Jibanlata Devi vs. High Court of Manipur (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encroachment of Village Lands: Maharashtra Rajya Vadar Samaj Sangh vs. Union of India (24 November 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Judges, Land Law, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Land Revenue (Extraction and Removal of Minor Minerals) Rules, 1968, Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mines and Minerals Law, Mines and Minerals Law with Section 15

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encroachment of Village Lands: Maharashtra Rajya Vadar Samaj Sangh vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government resolution prohibiting the use of village common lands for private purposes infringes upon the traditional rights of a nomadic tribe to extract stones. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation/Constitutional Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encroachment of Village Lands: Maharashtra Rajya Vadar Samaj Sangh vs. Union of India (24 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows Banks’ challenge to RBI’s disclosure of information under RTI Act: HDFC Bank Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 35, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with Section 45NB, Right to Information Act, 2005, Right to Information Act, 2005 with Section 11, Right to Information Act, 2005 with Section 8

Supreme Court allows Banks’ challenge to RBI’s disclosure of information under RTI Act: HDFC Bank Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) Date of the Judgment: 30 September 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 838 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a previous judgment of the Supreme Court be challenged through a writ petition? The Supreme

Supreme Court allows Banks’ challenge to RBI’s disclosure of information under RTI Act: HDFC Bank Ltd. vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of plea challenging Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act: Munilal & Ors. vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Anr. (28 September 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Fundamental Rights, J.B. Pardiwala, Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act, 2005, Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act, 2005, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of plea challenging Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act: Munilal & Ors. vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Anr. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 28 September 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI., S. Ravindra Bhat, J., J.B. Pardiwala, J. Can a petition challenging the validity of a law

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of plea challenging Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act: Munilal & Ors. vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Anr. (28 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies tender disqualification based on prior contract termination: Adani Ports Case (2022)

/ Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration, Concession Agreement, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Contract Law, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Tender Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Tender Disqualification Based on Prior Contract Termination: Adani Ports Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether termination of a prior concession agreement can be a ground for disqualification in subsequent tenders. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Law Case Name: Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited vs. The Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru

Supreme Court clarifies tender disqualification based on prior contract termination: Adani Ports Case (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “in-service” doctor status for PG admissions in ESIC: Hemant Kumar Verma vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation (22 July 2022)

/ A S Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 59(B), In-service Doctors, Judges, Reservation in Promotions, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Distinction Between Junior Residents and In-Service Doctors in ESIC: Hemant Kumar Verma vs. ESIC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Junior Resident Doctors are equivalent to ‘in-service’ doctors for availing reservation in Post Graduate medical courses. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Education Law Case Name: Hemant Kumar Verma & Ors vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Supreme Court clarifies “in-service” doctor status for PG admissions in ESIC: Hemant Kumar Verma vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation (22 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe into Chhattisgarh Killings, Imposes Costs: Himanshu Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 195, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 340, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 191, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 192, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 211, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe into Chhattisgarh Killings, Imposes Costs: Himanshu Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the investigation of alleged killings of tribals in Chhattisgarh should be transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). CASE TYPE: Criminal Writ Petition Case Name: Himanshu Kumar and Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and

Supreme Court Refuses CBI Probe into Chhattisgarh Killings, Imposes Costs: Himanshu Kumar vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2022) Read Post »

Child Custody Dispute: Supreme Court Orders Return of Children to USA

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 17, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 7, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 13, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 with Section 6, J.B. Pardiwala, Judges

Supreme Court Orders Return of Children to USA in Custody Battle LEGAL ISSUE: International Child Custody and Habeas Corpus CASE TYPE: Family Law, Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: Rajeswari Chandrasekar Ganesh vs. The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. Judgment Date: 14 July 2022 Date of the Judgment: 14 July 2022 Citation: [Not Available in Source]

Child Custody Dispute: Supreme Court Orders Return of Children to USA Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-PG Counselling Schedule, Denies Special Stray Round: Dr. Astha Goel vs. Medical Counselling Committee (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Judges, M.R. Shah, Medical Admissions, Supreme Court Judgments, Supreme Court Judgments with Education Promotion Society for India and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors., (2019) 7 SCC 38, Supreme Court Judgments with Supreet Batra and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors., (2003) 3 SCC 370

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-PG Counselling Schedule, Denies Special Stray Round: Dr. Astha Goel vs. Medical Counselling Committee (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Medical Counselling Committee should conduct a special stray round of counselling to fill vacant NEET-PG seats after the scheduled rounds are completed. CASE TYPE: Medical Admissions/Education Case Name: Dr. Astha Goel and Ors.

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-PG Counselling Schedule, Denies Special Stray Round: Dr. Astha Goel vs. Medical Counselling Committee (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits direct sale and export of iron ore from Karnataka: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (20 May 2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Hima Kohli, Judges, Krishna Murari, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, N. V. Ramana

Supreme Court permits direct sale and export of iron ore from Karnataka: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (20 May 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether to allow direct sale and export of iron ore from Karnataka, bypassing the e-auction process. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation related to mining and environmental law. Case Name: Samaj Parivartana

Supreme Court permits direct sale and export of iron ore from Karnataka: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (20 May 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top