Constitutional Law with Article 323A

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Challenging Tribunal Transfer Orders: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 25, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 5, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 323A, Constitutional Law with Article 323B, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Challenging Tribunal Transfer Orders: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct High Court jurisdiction for judicial review of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) transfer orders. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Administrative Law Case Name: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay Judgment Date: 06 January 2022 Date of […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Challenging Tribunal Transfer Orders: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Tribunal Independence and Member Appointments: Madras Bar Association vs. Union of India (27 November 2020)

/ Administrative Law, Administrative Law with Tribunal Rules 2020, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 323A, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat, Separation of Powers, Tribunal Independence

Supreme Court Addresses Tribunal Independence and Member Appointments: Madras Bar Association vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: The constitutional validity of rules governing the selection, appointment, tenure, and service conditions of members of various tribunals. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Administrative Law Case Name: Madras Bar Association vs. Union of India & Anr. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Addresses Tribunal Independence and Member Appointments: Madras Bar Association vs. Union of India (27 November 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overrules Key Aspects of Finance Act 2017 on Tribunal Appointments and Powers: Rojer Mathew vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. (2019) INSC 877 (13 November 2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 110, Constitutional Law with Article 323A, Deepak Gupta, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Finance Act, 2017, Finance Act, 2017 with Section 184, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Ranjan Gogoi, Sanjiv Khanna, Separation of Powers, Tribunal Appointments

Supreme Court Overrules Key Aspects of Finance Act 2017 on Tribunal Appointments and Powers LEGAL ISSUE: Constitutionality of the Finance Act, 2017, specifically regarding tribunal appointments and powers. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Tribunal Law Case Name: Rojer Mathew vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. Judgment Date: 13 November 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Overrules Key Aspects of Finance Act 2017 on Tribunal Appointments and Powers: Rojer Mathew vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. (2019) INSC 877 (13 November 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top