Constitutional Law with Article 342

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Hindu Succession Act to Scheduled Tribes: Tirith Kumar vs. Daduram (2024)

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Hindu Succession Act to Scheduled Tribes: Tirith Kumar vs. Daduram (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 to members of Scheduled Tribes. CASE TYPE: Civil (Succession) Case Name: Tirith Kumar & Ors. vs. Daduram & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 19th December 2024 Date of the Judgment: 19th December […]

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Hindu Succession Act to Scheduled Tribes: Tirith Kumar vs. Daduram (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Scheduled Tribe Status for Chandigarh Housing Allotment: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. Tarsem Lal (2024) INSC 119 (07 February 2024)

Supreme Court Clarifies Scheduled Tribe Status for Chandigarh Housing Allotment LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Tribe in one state can claim the same status in a Union Territory where no Presidential Order for Scheduled Tribes exists. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal related to housing allotment and reservation policy. Case Name: Chandigarh Housing

Supreme Court Clarifies Scheduled Tribe Status for Chandigarh Housing Allotment: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. Tarsem Lal (2024) INSC 119 (07 February 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds ‘Mana’ Tribe Claim, Emphasizes Pre-Constitution Documents: Priya Pramod Gajbe vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds ‘Mana’ Tribe Claim, Emphasizes Pre-Constitution Documents: Priya Pramod Gajbe vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of Scheduled Tribe Certificate. CASE TYPE: Tribal Law. Case Name: Priya Pramod Gajbe vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others. [Judgment Date]: July 11, 2023 Date of the Judgment: July 11, 2023. Citation: 2023 INSC

Supreme Court Upholds ‘Mana’ Tribe Claim, Emphasizes Pre-Constitution Documents: Priya Pramod Gajbe vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles reservation benefits for employees post-state reorganization: Akhilesh Prasad vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission (26 April 2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Reservation Benefits Post-State Reorganization in Akhilesh Prasad vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of a bifurcated state are entitled to reservation benefits in the newly formed state for promotions through limited departmental examinations. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Akhilesh Prasad vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission and Ors. Judgment

Supreme Court settles reservation benefits for employees post-state reorganization: Akhilesh Prasad vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission (26 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Notification Granting Scheduled Tribe Status to ‘Lohar’ Community in Bihar: Sunil Kumar Rai & Ors. vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. (21 February 2022)

Supreme Court Quashes Notification Granting Scheduled Tribe Status to ‘Lohar’ Community in Bihar LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State Government can grant Scheduled Tribe status to a community not recognized as such under the Presidential Order. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Writ Petition Case Name: Sunil Kumar Rai & Ors. vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.

Supreme Court Quashes Notification Granting Scheduled Tribe Status to ‘Lohar’ Community in Bihar: Sunil Kumar Rai & Ors. vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. (21 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Land Transfers to Non-State Scheduled Castes: Bhadar Ram vs. Jassa Ram (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Land Transfers to Non-State Scheduled Castes: Bhadar Ram vs. Jassa Ram (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in one state can claim the benefits of that status in another state for land transactions. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Land Rights, Scheduled Caste Protections Case Name: Bhadar

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Land Transfers to Non-State Scheduled Castes: Bhadar Ram vs. Jassa Ram (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Land Transfers to Scheduled Castes from Other States: Bhadar Ram vs. Jassa Ram (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Land Transfers to Scheduled Castes from Other States: Bhadar Ram vs. Jassa Ram (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in one state can claim the same benefits in another state for land transactions. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Rights and Scheduled Caste Protections Case

Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Land Transfers to Scheduled Castes from Other States: Bhadar Ram vs. Jassa Ram (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies reservation benefits for migrant Scheduled Tribes in Union Territories: Director Transport Department vs. Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel (2019)

Supreme Court clarifies reservation benefits for migrant Scheduled Tribes in Union Territories: Director Transport Department vs. Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel (2019) Date of the Judgment: May 7, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 463 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a person belonging to a Scheduled Tribe in one state claim reservation benefits in a

Supreme Court clarifies reservation benefits for migrant Scheduled Tribes in Union Territories: Director Transport Department vs. Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top