Constitutional Law with Article 366

Supreme Court Clarifies Taxability of Members’ Clubs Post 46th Amendment: State of West Bengal vs. Calcutta Club Limited (2019)

/ Companies Act, 1956, Companies Act, 1956 with Section 25, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 366, Constitutional Law with Article 366(29-A), Finance Act, 1994, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 2(d), Judges, R.F. Nariman, Surya Kant, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Taxability of Members’ Clubs Post 46th Amendment: State of West Bengal vs. Calcutta Club Limited (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the doctrine of mutuality to incorporated clubs regarding sales tax and service tax after the 46th Amendment to the Constitution of India. CASE TYPE: Tax Law (Sales Tax and Service Tax) Case […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Taxability of Members’ Clubs Post 46th Amendment: State of West Bengal vs. Calcutta Club Limited (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the need for legislative backing for water charges: Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. vs. State of Bihar (2017)

/ Bihar Irrigation Act, 1876, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 265, Constitutional Law with Article 366, Fundamental Rights, Government Fees, J. Chelameswar, Judges, S. Abdul Nazeer, State Legislation, Water Law, Water Rights

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State can demand payment for water usage without explicit legal authorization. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Water Rights and Government Fees Case Name: Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. & Another vs. State of Bihar & Others [Judgment Date]: 15 December 2017 Can a state government demand payment for water used

Supreme Court clarifies the need for legislative backing for water charges: Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. vs. State of Bihar (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top