Constitutional Law with Article 39(b)

Competition Act Applicability: Supreme Court Rules on Coal India’s Monopoly (2023)

/ Abuse of Dominant Position, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, B.V. Nagarathna, Competition Act, 2002 with Section 4(1), Competition Act, 2002 with Section 60, Competition Law, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 31B, Constitutional Law with Article 39(b), Fundamental Rights, Judges, K.M. Joseph

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Competition Act to Coal India Limited (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Competition Act, 2002 to Coal India Limited and its subsidiaries, which operate under a statutory monopoly. CASE TYPE: Competition Law Case Name: Coal India Limited and Anr. vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr. [Judgment Date]: 15 June […]

Competition Act Applicability: Supreme Court Rules on Coal India’s Monopoly (2023) Read Post »

Competition Act Applicability: Supreme Court Rules on Coal India’s Monopoly Status (2023)

/ Abuse of Dominant Position, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, B.V. Nagarathna, Competition Act, 2002, Competition Act, 2002 with Section 4, Competition Act, 2002 with Section 60, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 31B, Constitutional Law with Article 39(b), Directive Principles of State Policy, Judges, K.M. Joseph

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Competition Act to Coal India Limited LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Competition Act, 2002 to Coal India Limited, a statutory monopoly. CASE TYPE: Competition Law Case Name: Coal India Limited and Anr. vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr. Judgment Date: 15 June 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 15

Competition Act Applicability: Supreme Court Rules on Coal India’s Monopoly Status (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Re-examines Land Acquisition Compensation Under Karnataka Slum Act: State of Karnataka vs. B.R. Muralidhar (28 July 2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 31C, Constitutional Law with Article 39(b), Fundamental Rights, Judges, Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973, Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973 with Section 20, Land Acquisition, Sanjiv Khanna, Slum Improvement

Supreme Court Re-examines Land Acquisition Compensation Under Karnataka Slum Act Date of the Judgment: 28 July 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1966 of 2013, with Civil Appeal No. … of 2022 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 18942 of 2013) Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J. Can a state law that dictates compensation for

Supreme Court Re-examines Land Acquisition Compensation Under Karnataka Slum Act: State of Karnataka vs. B.R. Muralidhar (28 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Mandates Fresh Mining Leases in Goa, Quashing Second Renewals: Goa Foundation vs. Sesa Sterlite Ltd. (2018)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 39(b), Deepak Gupta, Environmental Clearances, Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Law, Judges, Madan B. Lokur, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 with Section 8(3), Mining Leases

Supreme Court Mandates Fresh Mining Leases in Goa, Quashing Second Renewals: Goa Foundation vs. Sesa Sterlite Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State of Goa was correct in granting second renewals of mining leases instead of granting fresh leases as directed by the Supreme Court. CASE TYPE: Mining Law, Environmental Law Case Name: The Goa

Supreme Court Mandates Fresh Mining Leases in Goa, Quashing Second Renewals: Goa Foundation vs. Sesa Sterlite Ltd. (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top