Fundamental Rights

Supreme Court grants last chance to Senior Advocate after gown withdrawal: Yatin Narendra Oza vs. High Court of Gujarat (28 October 2021)

Supreme Court grants last chance to Senior Advocate after gown withdrawal: Yatin Narendra Oza vs. High Court of Gujarat (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can withdraw the designation of a Senior Advocate for misconduct. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Professional Misconduct Case Name: Yatin Narendra Oza vs. High Court of Gujarat Judgment Date: 28 […]

Supreme Court grants last chance to Senior Advocate after gown withdrawal: Yatin Narendra Oza vs. High Court of Gujarat (28 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Strikes Down First Come First Serve Policy for Land Licenses in Haryana: Anant Raj Ltd. vs. State of Haryana (27 October 2021)

Supreme Court Strikes Down First Come First Serve Policy for Land Licenses in Haryana LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the First Come First Serve (FCFS) policy adopted by the State of Haryana for granting licenses for developing group housing colonies is legally valid. CASE TYPE: Land and Urban Development Law Case Name: Anant Raj Ltd. vs. State

Supreme Court Strikes Down First Come First Serve Policy for Land Licenses in Haryana: Anant Raj Ltd. vs. State of Haryana (27 October 2021) Read Post »

Pegasus Spyware: Supreme Court Orders Independent Probe into Surveillance Allegations (27 October 2021)

Supreme Court Appoints Expert Committee to Probe Pegasus Spyware Allegations LEGAL ISSUE: Allegations of unauthorized surveillance using spyware and its impact on the right to privacy and freedom of speech. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Constitutional Law, Cyber Law Case Name: Manohar Lal Sharma vs. Union of India and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 27 October 2021

Pegasus Spyware: Supreme Court Orders Independent Probe into Surveillance Allegations (27 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Ensures Equal Land Allotment for All Mill Workers: Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2002 of Azam Jahi Mill Workers Association vs. National Textile Corporation Limited & Ors. (26 October 2021)

Supreme Court Orders Parity in Land Allotment for Mill Workers Date of the Judgment: 26 October 2021 Citation: Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2002 of Azam Jahi Mill Workers Association vs. National Textile Corporation Limited & Ors., Civil Appeal Nos. 6260-61 of 2021 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and A.S. Bopanna, J. Can a group of

Supreme Court Ensures Equal Land Allotment for All Mill Workers: Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2002 of Azam Jahi Mill Workers Association vs. National Textile Corporation Limited & Ors. (26 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Recalls Custody Order, Cites Fraud in Child Custody Battle: Smriti Madan Kansagra vs. Perry Kansagra (2021)

Supreme Court Recalls Custody Order, Cites Fraud in Smriti Madan Kansagra vs. Perry Kansagra (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Fraudulent procurement of a child custody order. CASE TYPE: Family Law, Guardianship. Case Name: Smriti Madan Kansagra vs. Perry Kansagra. Judgment Date: 7 October 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 7 October 2021 Citation: Not Available Judges: Uday

Supreme Court Recalls Custody Order, Cites Fraud in Child Custody Battle: Smriti Madan Kansagra vs. Perry Kansagra (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Government Accommodation for Kashmiri Migrants: Union of India vs. Omkar Nath Dhar (2021)

Supreme Court Limits Government Accommodation for Kashmiri Migrants: Union of India vs. Omkar Nath Dhar (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether retired Kashmiri migrant government employees are entitled to retain government accommodation indefinitely. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Union of India & Anr. vs. Omkar Nath Dhar (D) Through L.Rs. Judgment Date: 7 October 2021 Introduction Date

Supreme Court Limits Government Accommodation for Kashmiri Migrants: Union of India vs. Omkar Nath Dhar (2021) Read Post »

DNA Test Not Mandatory: Supreme Court Protects Right to Privacy in Property Dispute: Ashok Kumar vs. Raj Gupta (2021)

Supreme Court on DNA Test in Property Disputes: Ashok Kumar vs. Raj Gupta (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party in a property dispute can be compelled to undergo a DNA test against their will to prove lineage. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Dispute) Case Name: Ashok Kumar vs. Raj Gupta & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 1 October

DNA Test Not Mandatory: Supreme Court Protects Right to Privacy in Property Dispute: Ashok Kumar vs. Raj Gupta (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit for Rehbar-e-Taleem Teachers: State of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Shaheena Masarat (2021)

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit for Rehbar-e-Taleem Teachers: State of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Shaheena Masarat (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the upper age limit for appointment of Rehbar-e-Taleem (Re-T) teachers is mandatory or directory. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of Jammu And Kashmir & Ors. vs. Shaheena Masarat & Anr. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit for Rehbar-e-Taleem Teachers: State of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Shaheena Masarat (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits High Court’s Power to Issue Blanket Orders on Bail and Arrests: High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan vs. The State of Rajasthan & Anr. (29 September 2021)

Supreme Court Limits High Court’s Power to Issue Blanket Orders on Bail and Arrests Date of the Judgment: 29 September 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 648 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., Aniruddha Bose, J. Can a High Court issue blanket orders restricting the listing of bail applications and directing police not to make arrests in certain

Supreme Court Limits High Court’s Power to Issue Blanket Orders on Bail and Arrests: High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan vs. The State of Rajasthan & Anr. (29 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court upholds differential promotion criteria based on educational qualifications: Chandan Banerjee vs. Krishna Prosad Ghosh (21 September 2021)

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Promotion Criteria Based on Educational Qualifications: Chandan Banerjee vs. Krishna Prosad Ghosh (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a classification based on educational qualifications for promotion to supernumerary posts within the same cadre is valid under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Chandan Banerjee

Supreme Court upholds differential promotion criteria based on educational qualifications: Chandan Banerjee vs. Krishna Prosad Ghosh (21 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award, Emphasizes Limited Judicial Review in Contractual Matters: Uflex Ltd. vs. Government of Tamil Nadu (2021)

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award, Emphasizes Limited Judicial Review in Contractual Matters Date of the Judgment: September 17, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 625 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can unsuccessful bidders challenge tender processes merely on the basis of perceived irregularities? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, emphasizing that

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award, Emphasizes Limited Judicial Review in Contractual Matters: Uflex Ltd. vs. Government of Tamil Nadu (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court extends retirement age for AYUSH doctors retrospectively: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Dr. Ram Naresh Sharma & Ors. (2021) INSC 489 (03 August 2021)

Supreme Court extends retirement age for AYUSH doctors retrospectively Date of the Judgment: 03 August 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 489 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can doctors practicing traditional medicine (AYUSH) be treated differently from allopathic doctors regarding their retirement age? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent

Supreme Court extends retirement age for AYUSH doctors retrospectively: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Dr. Ram Naresh Sharma & Ors. (2021) INSC 489 (03 August 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top