Review of Judgments

Supreme Court Restores Land Compensation: Ram Chander vs. Union of India (20 April 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Compensation, Judges, Judicial Review, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4, M. R. Shah, Review of Judgments

Supreme Court Restores Land Compensation: Ram Chander vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in reviewing its earlier judgment based on a subsequently overruled precedent, when the overruled precedent was later restored on remand. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Sh. Ram Chander (Dead) Thr Lrs vs. Union of […]

Supreme Court Restores Land Compensation: Ram Chander vs. Union of India (20 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Cryptic Review Order in Service Matter: Ratan Lal Patel vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Civil Procedure, Judges, M.R. Shah, Review Jurisdiction, Review of Judgments, Service Law

Supreme Court Sets Aside Cryptic Review Order in Service Matter: Ratan Lal Patel vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can allow a review petition without specifying the error apparent on the face of the record. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Ratan Lal Patel vs. Dr. Hari Singh

Supreme Court Sets Aside Cryptic Review Order in Service Matter: Ratan Lal Patel vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwavidyalaya (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Modification Plea in Supertech Demolition Case: Supertech Limited vs. Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association (2021)

/ Apartment Ownership, B V Nagarathna, Civil Procedure, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Miscellaneous Applications, Review of Judgments, Uttar Pradesh Apartments Act, 2010, Uttar Pradesh Apartments Act, 2010 with Section 4

Supreme Court Rejects Modification Plea in Supertech Demolition Case (2021) Date of the Judgment: 4 October 2021 Citation: Miscellaneous Application No 1572 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No 5041 of 2021 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and B V Nagarathna, J. Can a developer circumvent a Supreme Court order for demolition by proposing a

Supreme Court Rejects Modification Plea in Supertech Demolition Case: Supertech Limited vs. Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Corrects Arithmetical Errors in Land Acquisition Compensation Case: Hukam Singh vs. State of Haryana (2019)

/ Civil Procedure, Civil Procedure with Order (not present), Compensation, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act with Section (not present), Review of Judgments, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Corrects Arithmetical Errors in Land Acquisition Compensation Case: Hukam Singh vs. State of Haryana (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Correction of arithmetical errors in a judgment concerning land acquisition compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Hukam Singh etc. etc. vs. State of Haryana and Anr. etc. etc. [Judgment Date]: February 8, 2019 Date of

Supreme Court Corrects Arithmetical Errors in Land Acquisition Compensation Case: Hukam Singh vs. State of Haryana (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in correcting errors: Mohammed Zakir vs. Shabana & Ors. (23 July 2018)

/ Clerical Errors, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 362, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Review of Judgments, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 362 CrPC in correcting errors: Mohammed Zakir vs. Shabana & Ors. (23 July 2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) in correcting errors in court orders. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Mohammed Zakir vs. Shabana & Ors. Judgment Date: 23

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in correcting errors: Mohammed Zakir vs. Shabana & Ors. (23 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petitions Dismissed (9 July 2018)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Criminal Appeal, Criminal Law, Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, R. Banumathi, Review of Judgments, Review Petition, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petitions Dismissed (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of death penalty in a criminal case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Vinay Sharma & Anr. vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Judgment Date: 9 July 2018 Date of the Judgment: 9 July 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges:

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty in Nirbhaya Case: Review Petitions Dismissed (9 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies property sale order in Specific Performance Case: Satya Jain vs. Anis Ahmed Rushdie (2013) INSC 371 (8 May 2013)

/ Civil Law, Judges, Modification of Judgments, P. Sathasivam, Property Law, Ranjan Gogoi, Review of Judgments, Section 16, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Performance, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Supreme Court Rules, 1966

Date of the Judgment: 8 May 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 371 Judges: P. Sathasivam, J., Ranjan Gogoi, J. Can a court modify its final order after it has been passed? The Supreme Court addressed this question when it was asked to clarify its earlier order regarding the sale of a property. This case involves a

Supreme Court clarifies property sale order in Specific Performance Case: Satya Jain vs. Anis Ahmed Rushdie (2013) INSC 371 (8 May 2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top