Constitutional Law

Supreme Court Upholds Uniform Retirement Age for UP Jal Nigam Employees: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Dayanand Chakrawarty (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 2, 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 465 Judges: G.S. Singhvi, J., Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. Can a government body create different retirement ages for employees based solely on their source of entry? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case concerning the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam. The […]

Supreme Court Upholds Uniform Retirement Age for UP Jal Nigam Employees: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Dayanand Chakrawarty (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies FIR Registration and Addresses Police Custody Rape Allegations in Criminal Appeal: Doliben Kantilal Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 1, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 463 Judges: P. Sathasivam, J., M.Y. Eqbal, J. Can police refuse to register a First Information Report (FIR) when a serious allegation, such as rape in police custody, is made? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case involving an American

Supreme Court Clarifies FIR Registration and Addresses Police Custody Rape Allegations in Criminal Appeal: Doliben Kantilal Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification for False Caste Certificate in Municipal Elections: Kalpana Dilip Bahirat vs. Pune Municipal Corp. (2013)

Date of the Judgment: June 27, 2013Citation: (2013) INSC 499Judges: A.K. Patnaik, J. and Ranjan Gogoi, J. Can a municipal corporation declare an election void if a candidate submits a false caste certificate? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the Pune Municipal Corporation. The court upheld the disqualification of

Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification for False Caste Certificate in Municipal Elections: Kalpana Dilip Bahirat vs. Pune Municipal Corp. (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Sentence Reduction in Rape Case: State of Haryana vs. Janak Singh (2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2013 Citation: 2013 INSC 354 Judges: G.S. Singhvi, J. and Ranjana Prakash Desai, J. Can a High Court reduce a rape sentence below the statutory minimum without providing specific reasons? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a recent case. The court emphasized that rape is

Supreme Court Rejects Sentence Reduction in Rape Case: State of Haryana vs. Janak Singh (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cairn-Vedanta Deal, Dismissing PIL on ONGC’s Pre-emption Rights (2013)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) should have exercised its right of first refusal (RoFR) over the sale of Cairn India Limited (CIL) shares to Vedanta Resources Plc. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Contract Law, Corporate Law Case Name: Arun Kumar Agrawal vs. Union of India & Others Judgment Date: May

Supreme Court Upholds Cairn-Vedanta Deal, Dismissing PIL on ONGC’s Pre-emption Rights (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies promotion criteria for Section Officers: B. Rugmini Amma vs. B.S. Nirmala Kumari (2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 6, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 318 Judges: H.L. Gokhale, J. and Ranjan Gogoi, J. Can a government order clarifying promotion rules unintentionally create new preferences? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case concerning promotions of typists to Section Officers in the Kerala Administrative Secretariat. The

Supreme Court clarifies promotion criteria for Section Officers: B. Rugmini Amma vs. B.S. Nirmala Kumari (2013) Read Post »

Land Acquisition: Supreme Court clarifies government’s power in Jayamma & Ors. vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Hassan (2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 6, 2013 Citation: [2013] INSC 310 Judges: G.S. Singhvi, J., Kurian Joseph, J. Can a High Court compel the government to complete land acquisition proceedings? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning land acquisition in Karnataka. The Court clarified that it cannot force the government

Land Acquisition: Supreme Court clarifies government’s power in Jayamma & Ors. vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Hassan (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence Due to 12-Year Delay in Mercy Petition: Mahendra Nath Das vs. Union of India (2013)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prolonged delay in deciding a mercy petition is grounds for commuting a death sentence to life imprisonment. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law. Case Name: Mahendra Nath Das vs. Union of India and others. Judgment Date: May 1, 2013 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 1, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 312 Judges: G.S.

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence Due to 12-Year Delay in Mercy Petition: Mahendra Nath Das vs. Union of India (2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Forged Lease, Reinforces Article 14: Usha Mehta vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh (2012)

Date of the Judgment: October 16, 2012 Citation: (2012) INSC 642 Judges: Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya Can a forged lease document grant any legal rights? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case involving a disputed land lease. The court upheld the decision of the Andhra Pradesh

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Forged Lease, Reinforces Article 14: Usha Mehta vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh (2012) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Despite 37-Year Delay in L.N. Mishra Assassination Case: Ranjan Dwivedi vs. CBI (2012) INSC 487 (17 August 2012)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal trial should be quashed due to excessive delay, violating the right to a speedy trial. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Ranjan Dwivedi vs. C.B.I., Through the Director General Judgment Date: 17 August 2012 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 17 August 2012 Citation: (2012) INSC 487 Judges: H.L. Dattu, J. and

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Despite 37-Year Delay in L.N. Mishra Assassination Case: Ranjan Dwivedi vs. CBI (2012) INSC 487 (17 August 2012) Read Post »

Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Supreme Court Transfers Case to High Court for Enhanced Monitoring (09 August 2012)

Date of the Judgment: 09 August 2012 Citation: 2012 INSC 478 Judges: S.H. Kapadia, CJI, A.K. Patnaik, J., Swatanter Kumar, J. Can a public interest litigation concerning a major industrial disaster be effectively managed by the Supreme Court, or is it better handled by a High Court with closer jurisdictional ties? The Supreme Court of

Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Supreme Court Transfers Case to High Court for Enhanced Monitoring (09 August 2012) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies compensation for forest land acquisition under KUZALR Act: Rajiv Sarin & Anr. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (09 August 2011)

Date of the Judgment: 09 August 2011 Citation: Rajiv Sarin & Anr. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (2011) INSC 477 Judges: S.H. Kapadia, CJI, Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J, K. S. Radhakrishnan, J, Swatanter Kumar, J, Anil R. Dave, J. Can the government acquire private forest land without providing compensation simply because the owner did

Supreme Court clarifies compensation for forest land acquisition under KUZALR Act: Rajiv Sarin & Anr. vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. (09 August 2011) Read Post »

Scroll to Top