Constitutional Law

Supreme Court clarifies the procedure for disclosure of documents to the accused in criminal trials: P. Ponnusamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Disclosure of Documents in Criminal Trials: P. Ponnusamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) Date of the Judgment: 7 November 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 1004 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can an accused demand documents not relied upon by the prosecution at the appellate stage? The Supreme […]

Supreme Court clarifies the procedure for disclosure of documents to the accused in criminal trials: P. Ponnusamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for 1992-93 Mumbai Riots Victims: Shakeel Ahmed vs. Union of India (2022)

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for 1992-93 Mumbai Riots Victims: Shakeel Ahmed vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State is obligated to provide compensation to victims of communal violence and implement recommendations of an inquiry commission. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Constitutional Law Case Name: Shakeel Ahmed v. Union of India & Ors.

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for 1992-93 Mumbai Riots Victims: Shakeel Ahmed vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies “Local Area” Definition for Entry Tax in Industrial Townships: OCL India Ltd. vs. State of Orissa (2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Local Area” Definition for Entry Tax in Industrial Townships LEGAL ISSUE: Whether industrial townships, excluded from municipal areas, qualify as “local areas” for entry tax under Entry 52 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. CASE TYPE: Tax Law (Entry Tax) Case Name: M/s. OCL INDIA LTD. vs. STATE

Supreme Court Clarifies “Local Area” Definition for Entry Tax in Industrial Townships: OCL India Ltd. vs. State of Orissa (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Additional License for Processed Iron Ore Exports: Chowgule & Company Limited vs. Assistant Director General of Foreign Trade (04 November 2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Additional License for Processed Iron Ore Exports LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an exporter is entitled to an additional license based on the export of processed iron ore when the export occurred during a period where the policy specifically excluded “Minerals and Ores” from eligibility. CASE TYPE: Foreign Trade Policy/Export Incentives Case

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Additional License for Processed Iron Ore Exports: Chowgule & Company Limited vs. Assistant Director General of Foreign Trade (04 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disallows Re-evaluation of Answer Scripts in Absence of Rules: Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences vs. Dr. Yerra Trinadh (2022)

Supreme Court Disallows Re-evaluation of Answer Scripts in Absence of Rules: Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences vs. Dr. Yerra Trinadh (2022) Date of the Judgment: November 4, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1173 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a High Court order the re-evaluation of answer scripts when the relevant rules

Supreme Court Disallows Re-evaluation of Answer Scripts in Absence of Rules: Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences vs. Dr. Yerra Trinadh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the issue of extension of time under One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme in banking cases: State Bank of India vs. Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 990 (04 November 2022)

Supreme Court on OTS Scheme: No Extension as a Right Date of the Judgment: 04 November 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 990 Judges: Justice M.R. Shah and Justice Krishna Murari Can a borrower demand an extension of time to repay a loan under a One Time Settlement (OTS) scheme as a matter of right? The Supreme

Supreme Court settles the issue of extension of time under One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme in banking cases: State Bank of India vs. Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (2022) INSC 990 (04 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence Due to Solitary Confinement and Delay: B.A. Umesh vs. Union of India (2022)

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence Due to Solitary Confinement and Delay: B.A. Umesh vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether prolonged solitary confinement and delays in processing a mercy petition can be grounds for commuting a death sentence to life imprisonment. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: B.A. Umesh vs. Union of India & Ors.

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence Due to Solitary Confinement and Delay: B.A. Umesh vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies compensation and rehabilitation for land acquisition under Coal Bearing Areas Act: Mahanadi Coal Fields Ltd. vs. Mathias Oram (2022) INSC 946 (3 November 2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Compensation and Rehabilitation in Mahanadi Coalfields Case LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of compensation and rehabilitation for land acquired under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement. Case Name: Mahanadi Coal Fields Ltd. & Anr. vs. Mathias Oram & Ors. Judgment Date: 3

Supreme Court clarifies compensation and rehabilitation for land acquisition under Coal Bearing Areas Act: Mahanadi Coal Fields Ltd. vs. Mathias Oram (2022) INSC 946 (3 November 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies abatement of suit and its effect on appeals: Maringmei Acham vs. M Maringmei Khuripou (2022)

Supreme Court clarifies abatement of suit and its effect on appeals: Maringmei Acham vs. M Maringmei Khuripou (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Effect of abatement of a suit on pending appeals arising from interlocutory orders in the suit. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Maringmei Acham vs. M Maringmei Khuripou Judgment Date: 03 November 2022 Date of the

Supreme Court clarifies abatement of suit and its effect on appeals: Maringmei Acham vs. M Maringmei Khuripou (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Reporting Duty Under POCSO Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Dr. Maroti Pimpalkar (2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Reporting Duty Under POCSO Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Dr. Maroti Pimpalkar (2022) Date of the Judgment: November 2, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 1004 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi, Justice C.T. Ravikumar Can a medical practitioner be held liable for not reporting sexual abuse of minor girls, even if they were not the

Supreme Court Upholds Reporting Duty Under POCSO Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Dr. Maroti Pimpalkar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules Commission Vendors entitled to 50% past service for pension: Union of India vs. Munshi Ram (2022)

Supreme Court rules Commission Vendors entitled to 50% past service for pension: Union of India vs. Munshi Ram (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Commission Vendors absorbed into regular railway service are entitled to have 50% of their past service counted towards pension benefits, similar to casual laborers. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Pensionary Benefits) Case Name: Union

Supreme Court rules Commission Vendors entitled to 50% past service for pension: Union of India vs. Munshi Ram (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Vice Chancellor Appointment for Violating UGC Norms in Kerala University: Sreejith P.S. vs. Rajasree M.S. (21 October 2022)

Supreme Court Quashes Vice Chancellor Appointment for Violating UGC Norms Date of the Judgment: 21 October 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 923 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a University appoint a Vice-Chancellor without adhering to the University Grants Commission (UGC) Regulations? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in

Supreme Court Quashes Vice Chancellor Appointment for Violating UGC Norms in Kerala University: Sreejith P.S. vs. Rajasree M.S. (21 October 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top