Supervisory Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025)

/ Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Supervisory Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025) LEGAL ISSUE: The extent of High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution in arbitration matters. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law. Case Name: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. [Judgment […]

Supreme Court Restrains High Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings: Serosoft Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of sub-letting under the Delhi Rent Control Act: M/S Puri Investments vs. M/S Young Friends & Co. & Ors. (23 February 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 227, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with Section 14, Eviction, Judges, Sub-letting, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Sub-letting Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Puri Investments vs. Young Friends & Co. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 23rd February 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1609 of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6516/2019) Judges: Justice Vineet Saran and Justice Aniruddha Bose. Can a landlord evict a tenant if

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of sub-letting under the Delhi Rent Control Act: M/S Puri Investments vs. M/S Young Friends & Co. & Ors. (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits High Court Intervention in Arbitration Matters: Deep Industries vs. ONGC (28 November 2019)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 5, Arbitration Proceedings, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, R.F. Nariman, Supervisory Jurisdiction, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Limits High Court Intervention in Arbitration Matters: Deep Industries vs. ONGC (2019) Date of the Judgment: 28 November 2019 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: R.F. Nariman, J., Aniruddha Bose, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a High Court interfere with an order passed in an arbitration proceeding, especially when the Arbitration and Conciliation

Supreme Court Limits High Court Intervention in Arbitration Matters: Deep Industries vs. ONGC (28 November 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Intervention in Society Dispute: Virudhunagar Hindu Nadargal Dharma Paribalana Sabai vs. Tuticorin Educational Society (2019)

/ Appellate Remedies, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLIII, Rule 1(r), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 104(1)(i), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Supervisory Jurisdiction, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Intervention in Society Dispute: Virudhunagar Hindu Nadargal Dharma Paribalana Sabai vs. Tuticorin Educational Society (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: The maintainability of a revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India when an appeal remedy is available under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Virudhunagar Hindu Nadargal Dharma

Supreme Court Intervention in Society Dispute: Virudhunagar Hindu Nadargal Dharma Paribalana Sabai vs. Tuticorin Educational Society (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top