Writ Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Conditions for Child Repatriation to the US in Habeas Corpus Case: Sri Nilanjan Bhattacharya vs. State of Karnataka (2020) INSC 483 (23 September 2020)

/ Child Welfare, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Custody Disputes, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Family Law, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 with Section 7, Indu Malhotra, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Writ Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Conditions for Child Repatriation to the US in Habeas Corpus Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can impose conditions on the repatriation of a child to their native country in a habeas corpus petition, especially concerning health certificates related to a pandemic. CASE TYPE: Habeas Corpus, Child Custody […]

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Conditions for Child Repatriation to the US in Habeas Corpus Case: Sri Nilanjan Bhattacharya vs. State of Karnataka (2020) INSC 483 (23 September 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of candidates in waiting lists for public service appointments: U.P. Public Service Commission vs. Uday Kumar Upadhyaya (2008)

/ Appointment, Constitutional Law, H.K. Sema, Judges, Markandey Katju, Service Law, Waiting List, Writ of Mandamus

Date of the Judgment: 14th February 2008 Citation: [Citation details will be added when available] Judges: H.K. Sema and Markandey Katju, JJ. Does being on a waiting list for a government job guarantee you the position? The Supreme Court addressed this important question in a case involving the U.P. Public Service Commission. The court clarified

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of candidates in waiting lists for public service appointments: U.P. Public Service Commission vs. Uday Kumar Upadhyaya (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top