Consumer Disputes

Maintainability of Revision Petition in Execution Proceedings: Supreme Court clarifies under Consumer Protection Act (2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order 45, Consumer Disputes, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 21, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 25, Execution of Decrees, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of revision petition in execution proceedings under Consumer Protection Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a revision petition is maintainable before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission against an order passed by the State Commission in an appeal arising out of execution proceedings. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Karnataka Housing Board vs. […]

Maintainability of Revision Petition in Execution Proceedings: Supreme Court clarifies under Consumer Protection Act (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Insurance Claim for Road Damage: Mahavir Road and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd vs. IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd (25 March 2019)

/ Consumer Disputes, Consumer Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Exclusions in Insurance Policies, Hemant Gupta, Insurance Law, Insurance Law with Section 1, Judges, Material Damage, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Insurance Claim for Road Damage: Mahavir Road and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd vs. IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd (2019) Date of the Judgment: 25 March 2019 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and Hemant Gupta, J Can an insurance company reject a claim for road

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Insurance Claim for Road Damage: Mahavir Road and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd vs. IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd (25 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles interest calculation for delayed possession in DLF Homes Panchkula case (2019)

/ Consumer Disputes, Consumer Law, Delayed Possession, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Real Estate, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court settles interest calculation for delayed possession in DLF Homes Panchkula case (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of interest for delayed possession and refunds in consumer disputes. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. vs. Sushila Devi and Anr. [Judgment Date]: 26 February 2019 Date of the Judgment: 26 February 2019 Citation:

Supreme Court settles interest calculation for delayed possession in DLF Homes Panchkula case (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Stays Imprisonment of Society Secretary in Consumer Case: H.K. Singla vs. Avtar Singh Saini & Ors. (2018) INSC 997 (14 December 2018)

/ Consumer Disputes, Consumer Law, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 27, Judges, R. Subhash Reddy, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Stays Imprisonment of Society Secretary in Consumer Case Date of the Judgment: 14 December 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 997 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., R. Subhash Reddy, J. Can a person be imprisoned for the default of a society they represent, without a specific order imposing personal liability? The Supreme Court addressed this

Supreme Court Stays Imprisonment of Society Secretary in Consumer Case: H.K. Singla vs. Avtar Singh Saini & Ors. (2018) INSC 997 (14 December 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies insurance exclusion for demolition by lawful authority in consumer case (7 December 2018)

/ Consumer Disputes, Consumer Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Exclusion Clauses, Insurance Law, Insurance Policy Interpretation, Jammu and Kashmir Municipal Corporation Act 2000, Jammu and Kashmir Municipal Corporation Act 2000 with Section 229, Judges, MR Shah

Supreme Court Clarifies Insurance Exclusion for Demolition by Lawful Authority in Consumer Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance company is liable to pay for damages when the insured property is demolished by a lawfully constituted authority, given an exclusion clause in the insurance policy. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law, Insurance Law Case Name: New India Assurance

Supreme Court clarifies insurance exclusion for demolition by lawful authority in consumer case (7 December 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Under-Insurance in Burglary Claim: I.C. Sharma vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2018)

/ Consumer Disputes, Consumer Law, Deepak Gupta, Householder Insurance, Insurance Law, Judges, Madan B. Lokur, Under-insurance

Supreme Court Clarifies Under-Insurance in Burglary Claim: I.C. Sharma vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of under-insurance clauses in householder insurance policies. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: I.C. Sharma vs. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Judgment Date: 10 January 2018 Date of the Judgment: 10 January 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 14

Supreme Court Clarifies Under-Insurance in Burglary Claim: I.C. Sharma vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Dispute for Fresh Adjudication: Siddharth Construction vs. D.T. Vora (2008)

/ B.N. Agrawal, Consumer Disputes, Consumer Law, G.S. Singhvi, Harjit Singh Bedi, Judges, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Date of the Judgment: July 31, 2008 Judges: Justice B.N. Agrawal, Justice Harjit Singh Bedi, Justice G.S. Singhvi When intricate questions of fact arise in consumer disputes, should the matter be resolved through detailed evidence and evaluation? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a case involving Siddharth Construction and D.T. Vora, focusing

Supreme Court Remands Consumer Dispute for Fresh Adjudication: Siddharth Construction vs. D.T. Vora (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top