Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 12(1)(c) Archives

Supreme Court Orders Completion of Amrapali Group Projects, Protecting Homebuyers: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2019)

July 23, 2019 / Arun Mishra, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 12(1)(c), Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 53, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with Section 7, Judges, Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 with Section 11(4), Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 with Section 4(2)(l)(D), Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 with Section 8, Uday Umesh Lalit

Amrapali Group Homebuyers Win Relief: Supreme Court Orders Project Completion LEGAL ISSUE: Protection of homebuyers’ rights and completion of stalled real estate projects. CASE TYPE: Real Estate/Consumer Law. Case Name: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 23 July 2019 Date of the Judgment: 23 July 2019 Citation: Not Available […]

Supreme Court Orders Completion of Amrapali Group Projects, Protecting Homebuyers: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Case: Anjum Hussain vs. Intellicity Business Park (2019)

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Case: Anjum Hussain vs. Intellicity Business Park (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a group of consumers with a common grievance can file a class action under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, even if they don’t all have the same individual purpose for purchasing a commercial unit. CASE TYPE: Consumer

Supreme Court extends interest on delayed flat possession: R V Prasannakumar vs. Mantri Castles (2019)

Supreme Court extends interest on delayed flat possession: R V Prasannakumar vs. Mantri Castles (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the liability of a developer to pay interest for delayed possession of a flat should be limited to a specific date or should continue until actual possession is offered. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law. Case Name: R V