Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(o)

Supreme Court clarifies consumer status in property conversion cases: Estate Officer vs. Charanjit Kaur (2021)

Supreme Court clarifies consumer status in property conversion cases: Estate Officer vs. Charanjit Kaur (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an allottee seeking conversion of leasehold property to freehold is a ‘consumer’ under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law, Property Law Case Name: Estate Officer and Anr. vs. Charanjit Kaur [Judgment Date]: 7 September […]

Supreme Court clarifies consumer status in property conversion cases: Estate Officer vs. Charanjit Kaur (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation in Housing Delay Case: NBCC vs. Shri Ram Trivedi (2021)

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation in Housing Delay Case: NBCC vs. Shri Ram Trivedi (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a builder’s commitment to “endeavour” to complete construction within a specific timeframe constitutes a binding obligation, and what is the appropriate compensation for delays in handing over possession of a dwelling unit. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: NBCC

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation in Housing Delay Case: NBCC vs. Shri Ram Trivedi (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Consumer Protection Act applicability to hospitals providing free services: Union of India vs. N K Srivastava (2020)

Supreme Court clarifies Consumer Protection Act applicability to hospitals providing free services: Union of India vs. N K Srivastava (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether hospitals providing some free services fall under the purview of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Union of India & Anr vs. N K Srivasta & Ors

Supreme Court clarifies Consumer Protection Act applicability to hospitals providing free services: Union of India vs. N K Srivastava (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles whether construction workers are consumers under Consumer Protection Act: Joint Labour Commissioner vs. Kesar Lal (2020)

Supreme Court settles whether construction workers are consumers under Consumer Protection Act: Joint Labour Commissioner vs. Kesar Lal (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a construction worker registered under the Building and Other Construction Workers’ (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, is a ‘consumer’ under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law

Supreme Court settles whether construction workers are consumers under Consumer Protection Act: Joint Labour Commissioner vs. Kesar Lal (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Compensation in Housing Society Dispute: Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank vs. Farmer Bank Employees Society (2019)

Supreme Court Directs Compensation in Housing Society Dispute: Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank vs. Farmer Bank Employees Society (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a cooperative bank is deficient in service for not transferring land to its employees’ housing society and whether the society is entitled to claim interest in the remaining land. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case

Supreme Court Directs Compensation in Housing Society Dispute: Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank vs. Farmer Bank Employees Society (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction of Consumer Forums over statutory dues in deficiency of service: Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority vs. Vidya Chetal (2019) INSC 851 (16 September 2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Consumer Forum Jurisdiction over Statutory Dues in Service Deficiency Cases Date of the Judgment: 16 September 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 851 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J., Ajay Rastogi, J. Can consumer forums decide if a statutory body’s demand for fees is justified? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction of Consumer Forums over statutory dues in deficiency of service: Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority vs. Vidya Chetal (2019) INSC 851 (16 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Surgeon Negligent for Operating with Low Platelet Count: Nand Kishore Prasad vs. Dr. Mohib Hamidi (2019)

Supreme Court Holds Surgeon Negligent for Operating with Low Platelet Count: Nand Kishore Prasad vs. Dr. Mohib Hamidi (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a surgeon was negligent in operating on a patient with a low platelet count. CASE TYPE: Medical Negligence under Consumer Law Case Name: Nand Kishore Prasad vs. Dr. Mohib Hamidi & Others Judgment

Supreme Court Holds Surgeon Negligent for Operating with Low Platelet Count: Nand Kishore Prasad vs. Dr. Mohib Hamidi (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top