Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r)

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r), Consumer Rights, Contract Law, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36B, Unconscionable Contracts, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1106 of 2009 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a real estate developer be held liable […]

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r), Contract Law, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 with Section 36A, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 912 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. (authored by L. Nageswara Rao, J.) Can a real estate developer be held

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules on Insurance Policy Renewal and Disclosure: Jacob Punnen & Anr. vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (9 December 2021)

/ Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(g), Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r), Contract Act, 1872, Contract Act, 1872 with Section 22, Deficiency in Service, Duty of Disclosure, Insurance Law, Insurance Law with Section 2(6C), Judges, K.M. Joseph, Renewal of Policy, S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court on Duty to Inform Policyholders of Changes During Renewal: Jacob Punnen vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2021) Date of the Judgment: 9 December 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 729 Judges: S. Ravindra Bhat, J. and K.M. Joseph, J. Is an insurance company obligated to inform its policyholders about changes in policy terms during

Supreme Court rules on Insurance Policy Renewal and Disclosure: Jacob Punnen & Anr. vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (9 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court on Unfair Terms in Apartment Buyer Agreements: Pioneer Urban Land vs. Govindan Raghavan (2019)

/ Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(o), Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(r), Contract Law, Indu Malhotra, Judges, One-Sided Contracts, Uday Umesh Lalit, Unfair Contract Terms, Unfair Trade Practices

Supreme Court on Unfair Terms in Apartment Buyer Agreements: Pioneer Urban Land vs. Govindan Raghavan (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether clauses in an Apartment Buyer’s Agreement are binding if they are one-sided and unfair. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection Case Name: Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. vs. Govindan Raghavan Judgment Date: April 2, 2019 Introduction Date

Supreme Court on Unfair Terms in Apartment Buyer Agreements: Pioneer Urban Land vs. Govindan Raghavan (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top