Deficiency of Service

Supreme Court clarifies promotional trailers are not offers in consumer dispute: Yash Raj Films vs. Afreen Fatima Zaidi (2024) INSC 328 (22 April 2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(a), Constitutional Law with Article 19(2), Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(r), Contract, Deficiency of Service, Freedom of Speech, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 2(a), Offer, Unfair Trade Practice

Supreme Court clarifies promotional trailers are not offers in consumer dispute: Yash Raj Films vs. Afreen Fatima Zaidi (2024) INSC 328 (22 April 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or amounts to unfair trade practice if the content is not shown in the movie. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case Name: […]

Supreme Court clarifies promotional trailers are not offers in consumer dispute: Yash Raj Films vs. Afreen Fatima Zaidi (2024) INSC 328 (22 April 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Deficiency of Service in Joint Fixed Deposit: Arun Bhatia vs. HDFC Bank (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Consumer, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(g), Deficiency of Service, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Deficiency of Service in Joint Fixed Deposit: Arun Bhatia vs. HDFC Bank (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a bank’s action of prematurely encashing a joint fixed deposit (FD) and crediting the proceeds to only one of the joint account holders constitutes a deficiency of service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Clarifies Deficiency of Service in Joint Fixed Deposit: Arun Bhatia vs. HDFC Bank (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court finds Doctor Negligent in Post-Surgery Complications Case: Harnek Singh & Ors. vs. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (2022)

/ Consumer Protection Act, Consumer Protection Act with Compensation, Deficiency of Service, Judges, Medical Council of India, Medical Council of India with Ethics Committee, Medical Negligence, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court finds Doctor Negligent in Post-Surgery Complications Case: Harnek Singh & Ors. vs. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Medical Negligence and Deficiency of Service by a Doctor CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection/Medical Negligence Case Name: Harnek Singh & Ors. vs. Gurmit Singh & Ors. [Judgment Date]: May 18, 2022 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court finds Doctor Negligent in Post-Surgery Complications Case: Harnek Singh & Ors. vs. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal on Deficiency of Service: IndusInd Bank vs. Simarjit Singh (2022)

/ Civil Law, Consumer Law, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, D.Y. Chandrachud, Damages, Deficiency of Service, Deficiency of Service, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal on Deficiency of Service: IndusInd Bank vs. Simarjit Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was correct in upholding the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s (SCDRC) order regarding the valuation of timber in a deficiency of service case. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: IndusInd Bank

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal on Deficiency of Service: IndusInd Bank vs. Simarjit Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Bank’s Service Deficiency in Insurance Claim: Hemiben Ladhabhai Bhanderi vs. Saurashtra Gramin Bank (2020) INSC 68 (03 February 2020)

/ Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Deficiency of Service, Consumer Rights, Deficiency of Service, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta, Judges

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Bank’s Service Deficiency in Insurance Claim Date of the Judgment: 03 February 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 68 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and Hemant Gupta, J Can a bank be held liable for deficiency of service when it fails to process an insurance application, leading to the rejection of

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Bank’s Service Deficiency in Insurance Claim: Hemiben Ladhabhai Bhanderi vs. Saurashtra Gramin Bank (2020) INSC 68 (03 February 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Bank Liable for Unauthorized Net Banking Transfer: DAV Public School vs. Indian Bank (2019)

/ Banking Law, Consumer Protection Act, Consumer Protection Act with, Deficiency of Service, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hrishikesh Roy, Internet Banking, Judges, Unauthorized Transactions

Supreme Court Holds Bank Liable for Unauthorized Net Banking Transfer: DAV Public School vs. Indian Bank (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a bank is liable for unauthorized online transfers when it links a customer’s account to internet banking without their request. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: DAV Public School vs. The Senior Manager, Indian Bank, Midnapur

Supreme Court Holds Bank Liable for Unauthorized Net Banking Transfer: DAV Public School vs. Indian Bank (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court holds Finance Company Liable for Delay in Insurance Policy Issuance: Ashatai vs. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. (2019)

/ Consumer Complaint, Consumer Law, Deficiency of Service, Indu Malhotra, Insurance Act, 1938, Insurance Act, 1938 with Section 64VB, Judges, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Holds Finance Company Liable for Delay in Insurance Policy Issuance: Ashatai vs. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a finance company is liable for deficiency of service for delaying the issuance of an insurance policy linked to a loan, resulting in non-payment of the loan amount upon the borrower’s death.

Supreme Court holds Finance Company Liable for Delay in Insurance Policy Issuance: Ashatai vs. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Additional Compensation in LIC Policy Dispute: Madhav Hari Joshi vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India (2019) INSC 1

/ Breach of contract, Consumer Law, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Contract Law, D.Y. Chandrachud, Deficiency of Service, Hemant Gupta, Insurance Law, Jeevan Aastha Plan, Judges, Life Insurance Corporation of India

Supreme Court Orders Additional Compensation in LIC Policy Dispute Date of the Judgment: January 4, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 1 Judges: Hon’ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta. This was a two-judge bench. Can an insurance company withhold a policy and a customer’s money after accepting a proposal and premium? The

Supreme Court Orders Additional Compensation in LIC Policy Dispute: Madhav Hari Joshi vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India (2019) INSC 1 Read Post »

Scroll to Top