Consumer Rights

Supreme Court enhances interest for delayed flat possession: Vidya vs. Parsvnath Developers (2024)

Supreme Court enhances interest for delayed flat possession: Vidya vs. Parsvnath Developers (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was justified in awarding interest at a rate lower than what was stipulated in the agreement for delayed possession of a flat. CASE TYPE: Consumer. Case Name: Vidya and Others vs. M/s […]

Supreme Court enhances interest for delayed flat possession: Vidya vs. Parsvnath Developers (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Terminate Agreement for Delayed Possession: Venkataraman Krishnamurthy vs. Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. (22 February 2024)

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Terminate Agreement for Delayed Possession: Venkataraman Krishnamurthy vs. Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a purchaser can terminate an agreement for sale and claim a refund when the builder fails to offer possession for fit-outs by the agreed-upon date, despite obtaining a partial occupancy certificate. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Terminate Agreement for Delayed Possession: Venkataraman Krishnamurthy vs. Lodha Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. (22 February 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Compensation with Increased Interest: P.C. Jain vs. Dr. R.P. Singh (2024)

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Compensation with Increased Interest: P.C. Jain vs. Dr. R.P. Singh (2024) Date of the Judgment: January 29, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 67 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., Sandeep Mehta, J. Can a medical professional’s negligence lead to a prolonged legal battle for compensation? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Compensation with Increased Interest: P.C. Jain vs. Dr. R.P. Singh (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Insurance Company to Reimburse Medical Expenses Despite Initial Non-Disclosure: Om Prakash Ahuja vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2023)

Supreme Court Orders Insurance Company to Reimburse Medical Expenses Despite Initial Non-Disclosure LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance company can deny a claim and refuse renewal of a health insurance policy based on non-disclosure of a pre-existing condition, when the insured’s death was caused by an unrelated illness. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: Om Prakash Ahuja

Supreme Court Orders Insurance Company to Reimburse Medical Expenses Despite Initial Non-Disclosure: Om Prakash Ahuja vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Rights: Dealer Must Provide New Car, Not Used One in Consumer Dispute (8 September 2022)

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Rights: Dealer Must Provide New Car, Not Used One Date of the Judgment: 8 September 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5928 of 2022 Judges: M. R. Shah, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can a car dealer deliver a used “demo” car to a customer who paid for a new one? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Rights: Dealer Must Provide New Car, Not Used One in Consumer Dispute (8 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Automaker Liable for Defective Airbags in Consumer Case: Hyundai Motor India Ltd. vs. Shailendra Bhatnagar (20 April 2022)

Supreme Court Holds Automaker Liable for Defective Airbags in Hyundai Motor India Ltd. vs. Shailendra Bhatnagar (2022) Date of the Judgment: 20 April 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 3001 of 2022 (Arising out of Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 4881 of 2021) Judges: Justice Vineet Saran and Justice Aniruddha Bose Can a

Supreme Court Holds Automaker Liable for Defective Airbags in Consumer Case: Hyundai Motor India Ltd. vs. Shailendra Bhatnagar (20 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies insurance claim rules for vehicle theft: Delay in intimation not always fatal: Jaina Construction Company vs. Oriental Insurance Company (2022)

Supreme Court on Delay in Insurance Claim for Vehicle Theft: Jaina Construction Company vs. Oriental Insurance Company (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance company can reject a claim for vehicle theft solely due to a delay in informing the company, despite a timely police report. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Jaina Construction Company vs.

Supreme Court clarifies insurance claim rules for vehicle theft: Delay in intimation not always fatal: Jaina Construction Company vs. Oriental Insurance Company (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022)

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Date of the Judgment: 25 January 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1106 of 2009 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a real estate developer be held liable

Supreme Court Upholds MRTP Commission’s Decision on Unfair Trade Practices in Real Estate: B.B. Patel vs. DLF Universal Ltd. (25 January 2022) Read Post »

Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Supreme Court rules in favor of Homebuyers in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022)

Supreme Court on Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the failure to obtain an occupancy certificate constitutes a continuing cause of action in a consumer dispute, allowing for claims beyond the standard limitation period. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case

Continuing Cause of Action in Consumer Disputes: Supreme Court rules in favor of Homebuyers in Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of representative consumer complaints under Section 35(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Brigade Enterprises Ltd. vs. Anil Kumar Virmani & Ors. (17 December 2021)

Supreme Court Clarifies Representative Consumer Complaints: Brigade Enterprises Ltd. vs. Anil Kumar Virmani & Ors. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a consumer complaint can be filed in a representative capacity on behalf of numerous consumers having the same interest, and the criteria for determining “sameness of interest”. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Brigade Enterprises Limited

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of representative consumer complaints under Section 35(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Brigade Enterprises Ltd. vs. Anil Kumar Virmani & Ors. (17 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns medical negligence ruling in Bombay Hospital case: Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Centre vs. Asha Jaiswal & Ors. (30 November 2021)

Supreme Court overturns medical negligence ruling in Bombay Hospital case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the principle of res ipsa loquitur can be applied to establish medical negligence in cases where the patient’s condition deteriorates despite treatment. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection/Medical Negligence Case Name: Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Centre vs. Asha Jaiswal & Ors. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court overturns medical negligence ruling in Bombay Hospital case: Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Centre vs. Asha Jaiswal & Ors. (30 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the interplay between Consumer Protection Act and RERA Act in favor of Homebuyers: Imperia Structures Ltd. vs. Anil Patni (2 November 2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Rights: Imperia Structures Ltd. vs. Anil Patni (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the remedies available to homebuyers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 are additional to those under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law, Real Estate Law Case Name: M/s Imperia Structures Ltd. vs. Anil Patni

Supreme Court settles the interplay between Consumer Protection Act and RERA Act in favor of Homebuyers: Imperia Structures Ltd. vs. Anil Patni (2 November 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top