Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 67

Supreme Court clarifies “voyage should commence & complete before monsoon sets in” clause in marine insurance: Sohom Shipping vs. New India Assurance (2025)

/ B. V. Nagarathna, Consumer Complaint, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 67, Contra Proferentum, Contract Law, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Satish Chandra Sharma

Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 07, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 453 Judges: B. V. Nagarathna, J., Satish Chandra Sharma, J. Can an insurance company reject a claim if a ship’s voyage starts before the monsoon but is delayed due to unforeseen circumstances? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question while examining a […]

Supreme Court clarifies “voyage should commence & complete before monsoon sets in” clause in marine insurance: Sohom Shipping vs. New India Assurance (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner to High Court in Insurance Claim Dispute: Universal Sompo vs. Suresh Chand Jain (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 21, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 23, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 58, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 67

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner to High Court in Insurance Claim Dispute: Universal Sompo vs. Suresh Chand Jain (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution is maintainable directly against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) passed in appellate jurisdiction. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner to High Court in Insurance Claim Dispute: Universal Sompo vs. Suresh Chand Jain (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Jurisdiction Under Article 227 in Consumer Disputes: Ibrat Faizan vs. Omaxe Buildhome Private Limited (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 58, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 with Section 67, Judges, Judicial Review, M.R. Shah, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Jurisdiction Under Article 227 in Consumer Disputes LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can entertain a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in an appeal under Section 58(1)(a)(iii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Jurisdiction Under Article 227 in Consumer Disputes: Ibrat Faizan vs. Omaxe Buildhome Private Limited (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top