Non-Compliance of Court Orders

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt of Court: Sitaram Enterprises vs. Prithviraj Jain (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 129, Contempt of Court, Non-Compliance of Court Orders

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt of Court: Sitaram Enterprises vs. Prithviraj Jain (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant’s repeated failure to comply with court orders and undertakings constitutes contempt of court. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court Case Name: M/s Sitaram Enterprises vs. Prithviraj Vardichand Jain Judgment Date: September 09, 2024 Introduction Date of the Judgment: September […]

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt of Court: Sitaram Enterprises vs. Prithviraj Jain (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies redevelopment rights in Mumbai property dispute: Jagdish Mavji Tank vs. Harresh Navnitrai Mehta (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Civil Law, Contempt of Court, Development Control Regulations, 1991, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), Non-Compliance of Court Orders, Property Redevelopment, Redevelopment Regulations, Regulation 33(7), Development Control Regulations, 1991, Regulation 33(9), Development Control Regulations, 1991

Supreme Court clarifies redevelopment rights in Mumbai property dispute: Jagdish Mavji Tank vs. Harresh Navnitrai Mehta (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Redevelopment of property and compliance with court orders. CASE TYPE: Contempt and Civil Appeal Case Name: Jagdish Mavji Tank (Dead) Through Lrs. & Ors. vs. Harresh Navnitrai Mehta & Ors. [Judgment Date]: April 19, 2022 Introduction

Supreme Court clarifies redevelopment rights in Mumbai property dispute: Jagdish Mavji Tank vs. Harresh Navnitrai Mehta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petitions in Flat Buyer Case: Raj Kapoor & Ors. vs. Ram Kishor Arora & Ors. (27 January 2022)

/ Civil Procedure, Contempt of Court, D.Y. Chandrachud, Enforcement of Orders, Judges, Non-Compliance of Court Orders, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petitions in Flat Buyer Case: Raj Kapoor & Ors. vs. Ram Kishor Arora & Ors. (27 January 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Resolution of contempt petitions regarding payment of dues to flat buyers. CASE TYPE: Contempt Petition in a Civil Appeal Case Name: Raj Kapoor and Others vs. Ram Kishor Arora and

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petitions in Flat Buyer Case: Raj Kapoor & Ors. vs. Ram Kishor Arora & Ors. (27 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Bihar in Contempt for Non-Compliance in Pension Case (18 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Contempt of Court, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Non-Compliance of Court Orders, Pensionary Benefits, Retiral Benefits, Service Law

Supreme Court Holds Bihar in Contempt for Non-Compliance in Pension Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court for non-compliance of orders regarding pensionary benefits. CASE TYPE: Contempt Jurisdiction. Case Name: Bijay Kumar Sinha and Others vs. Tripurari Sharan and Others. Judgment Date: 18 January 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: Contempt

Supreme Court Holds Bihar in Contempt for Non-Compliance in Pension Case (18 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Payment in Contempt Case: Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. Sanjiv Gupta (23 September 2019)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Contempt of Court, Deepak Gupta, Enforcement of Court Orders, Interim Orders, Judges, Non-Compliance of Court Orders, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 with Section 13, Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002

Supreme Court Directs Payment in Contempt Case: Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. Sanjiv Gupta (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party is in contempt of court for not complying with an earlier order to pay a specific amount. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court Case Name: Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta & Others Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Directs Payment in Contempt Case: Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. Sanjiv Gupta (23 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kathuria Public Schools vs. Union of India (2016)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Anil R. Dave, Contempt of Court, Court Orders, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Non-Compliance of Court Orders, Shiva Kirti Singh, Undertaking to the Court

The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of land acquisition and possession in this case. The core legal question was whether the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) could take possession of land previously acquired, despite the appellant’s claims. This case highlights the importance of adhering to court orders and undertakings. Citation: This judgment is from

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kathuria Public Schools vs. Union of India (2016) Read Post »

Scroll to Top