Contempt of Courts Act

Supreme Court Orders Imprisonment and Recovery in Contempt Case Against Vijay Mallya

/ Civil Contempt, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 129, Contempt of Courts Act, Contempt of Courts Act with Contempt, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Orders Imprisonment and Recovery in Contempt Case Against Vijay Mallya LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court for Disobeying Orders and Transferring Funds CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court Case Name: State Bank of India and Ors. vs. Dr. Vijay Mallya Judgment Date: July 11, 2022 Date of the Judgment: July 11, 2022 Citation: Not Available […]

Supreme Court Orders Imprisonment and Recovery in Contempt Case Against Vijay Mallya Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Avitel in Contempt for Not Maintaining USD 60 Million Balance: HSBC PI Holdings vs. Pradeep Shantipershad Jain (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 9, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 129, Contempt of Court, Contempt of Courts Act, Contempt of Courts Act with willful disobedience, Judges, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Holds Avitel in Contempt for Not Maintaining USD 60 Million Balance: HSBC PI Holdings vs. Pradeep Shantipershad Jain (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether non-compliance with a court order to maintain a specific bank balance constitutes contempt of court, even if the order is executable through other means. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court Case Name:

Supreme Court Holds Avitel in Contempt for Not Maintaining USD 60 Million Balance: HSBC PI Holdings vs. Pradeep Shantipershad Jain (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Imprisonment for Contempt of Court in Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund vs. Dharmesh S. Jain (12 May 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Civil Procedure, Contempt of Court, Contempt of Courts Act, Enforcement of Court Orders, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sentencing for Contempt, Wilful Disobedience of Court Orders

Supreme Court Orders Imprisonment for Contempt of Court in Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund vs. Dharmesh S. Jain LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court for wilful disobedience of court orders. CASE TYPE: Contempt of Court Case Name: Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund vs. Dharmesh S. Jain and Another Judgment Date: 12 May 2022 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Orders Imprisonment for Contempt of Court in Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund vs. Dharmesh S. Jain (12 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Renewal of Licenses and Payment of Dues in Seth vs. Mittal Contempt Case (9 October 2020)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Contempt of Court, Contempt of Courts Act, Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, Judges, M.R. Shah, Memorandum of Settlement, Real Estate Law, Real Estate Law with Section 9-A, Settlement Agreements

Supreme Court Directs Renewal of Licenses and Payment of Dues in Seth vs. Mittal Contempt Case (2020) Date of the Judgment: 9 October 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 483 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a court compel parties to adhere to a settlement agreement when one party is accused of deliberately obstructing its

Supreme Court Directs Renewal of Licenses and Payment of Dues in Seth vs. Mittal Contempt Case (9 October 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs Mittal Group to fulfill obligations in land dispute case: Ashish Seth vs. Sumit Mittal (24 April 2020)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Breach of contract, Contempt of Court Order, Contempt of Courts Act, Contempt Proceedings, Contract Law, Contract Law with Memorandum of Settlement (MOS), Judges, M. R. Shah

Supreme Court directs Mittal Group to fulfill obligations in land dispute case Date of the Judgment: 24 April 2020 Citation: Not Available Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., M. R. Shah, J. Can a party to a settlement agreement, which has become a court order, selectively comply with terms that benefit them while ignoring their obligations? The

Supreme Court directs Mittal Group to fulfill obligations in land dispute case: Ashish Seth vs. Sumit Mittal (24 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Passport Deposit Order in Property Dispute: Shyam Sahni vs. Arjun Prakash (2020)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order XXXIX Rule 2A, Contempt of Courts Act, Contempt of Courts Act with Section 12, Contempt Proceedings, Judges, Order XXXIX Rule 2A, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds Passport Deposit Order in Property Dispute: Shyam Sahni vs. Arjun Prakash (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can direct a party to deposit their passport to ensure their presence in contempt proceedings for not adhering to undertakings given to the court. CASE TYPE: Civil Contempt, Property Dispute Case Name: Shyam Sahni vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Passport Deposit Order in Property Dispute: Shyam Sahni vs. Arjun Prakash (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Injunction Violations in Arbitration Cases: RK Arora vs. M/S Ace Enterprises (2018)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XXXIX Rule 2A, Contempt of Courts Act, Contempt of Courts Act with Section 10, Contempt of Subordinate Courts, Injunction, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Injunction Violations in Arbitration Cases: RK Arora vs. M/S Ace Enterprises (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Procedure for addressing violations of injunction orders in the context of arbitration proceedings. CASE TYPE: Civil, Arbitration Case Name: R K Arora General Manager & Anr. vs. M/S Ace Enterprises Judgment Date: 7 February 2018 Date

Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Injunction Violations in Arbitration Cases: RK Arora vs. M/S Ace Enterprises (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Employee Convicted of Moral Turpitude Despite Probation: Sushil Kumar Singhal vs. Punjab National Bank (2010)

/ B.S. Chauhan, Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with Section 10(1)(b)(i), Dismissal from Service, Judges, Moral Turpitude, P. Sathasivam, Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 with Section 12, Service Law

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee convicted of an offense involving moral turpitude can be dismissed from service, despite being granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Sushil Kumar Singhal vs. The Regional Manager, Punjab National Bank Judgment Date: 10 August 2010 Date of the Judgment: 10 August

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Employee Convicted of Moral Turpitude Despite Probation: Sushil Kumar Singhal vs. Punjab National Bank (2010) Read Post »

Scroll to Top