Business Efficacy

Supreme Court clarifies “Change in Law” under Power Purchase Agreements: Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (2024)

/ Business Efficacy, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 77, Contract Law, Contract Law with PPA, Customs Act, 1962, Customs Act, 1962 with Section 25, Interpretation of Contracts, Notifications

Supreme Court Clarifies “Change in Law” under Power Purchase Agreements: Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (2024) Date of the Judgment: 5th November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 833 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., Prashant Kumar Mishra, J., K.V. Viswanathan, J. Can a press release announcing a Cabinet decision be considered “law” under a […]

Supreme Court clarifies “Change in Law” under Power Purchase Agreements: Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award, Emphasizes Limited Judicial Review in Contractual Matters: Uflex Ltd. vs. Government of Tamil Nadu (2021)

/ Business Efficacy, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Law, Contract Law with Interpretation of Contracts, Fundamental Rights, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender (Public-Private Partnership Procurement) Rules, 2012 with Rule 15, Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998, Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998 with Section 10(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award, Emphasizes Limited Judicial Review in Contractual Matters Date of the Judgment: September 17, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 625 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can unsuccessful bidders challenge tender processes merely on the basis of perceived irregularities? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, emphasizing that

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award, Emphasizes Limited Judicial Review in Contractual Matters: Uflex Ltd. vs. Government of Tamil Nadu (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top