Supreme Court Upholds Resumption of Allotted Booth Due to Payment Default: Rajiv Vohra vs. State of Haryana (2019)

/ Allotment of Property, Breach of contract, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Contract Law, Contract Law with Payment Obligations, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, General Power of Attorney, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Property Law, Resumption of Property

Supreme Court Upholds Resumption of Allotted Booth Due to Payment Default: Rajiv Vohra vs. State of Haryana (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government authority can resume an allotted property due to non-payment of dues by the allottee. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Rajiv Vohra vs. The State of Haryana and Ors. Judgment Date: 21 February […]

Supreme Court Upholds Resumption of Allotted Booth Due to Payment Default: Rajiv Vohra vs. State of Haryana (2019) Read Post »