Contractual Agreements

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of an ‘Arbitration Agreement’ in contract disputes: Solaris Chem Tech Industries Ltd vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply Board (2023)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 7, Contract Law, Contractual Agreements, Dispute Resolution, Impartiality of Arbitrator, Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board Act, 1973, Water Supply Agreements

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Agreements: Solaris Chem Tech Industries Ltd vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply Board (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a clause providing for dispute resolution by a departmental authority constitutes a valid arbitration agreement. CASE TYPE: Contractual Dispute, Arbitration Law Case Name: Solaris Chem Tech Industries Ltd vs. Assistant Executive Engineer Karnataka Urban Water […]

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of an ‘Arbitration Agreement’ in contract disputes: Solaris Chem Tech Industries Ltd vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply Board (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “sum” under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration Act: Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (2022)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Proceedings, B.R. Gavai, Breach of contract, Concession Agreement, Contract Law, Contractual Agreements, Interest in Arbitration, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Section 31, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest Calculation Under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration Act: Delhi Airport Metro vs. Delhi Metro Rail (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the “sum” awarded under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 includes interest pendente lite. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited vs. Delhi Metro

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of “sum” under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration Act: Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (2022) Read Post »

Arbitration Clause Invoked: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Between Nirmal Software and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Appointment of Arbitrator, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 12, Contract Law, Contractual Agreements, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Nirmal Software Services vs. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute arising from a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) containing an arbitration clause should be referred to arbitration. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Nirmal Software Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University & Ors. [Judgment

Arbitration Clause Invoked: Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Between Nirmal Software and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top