Contractual Disputes

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Act’s Primacy Over Public Premises Act in Lease Disputes: Central Warehousing Corporation vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & Sanitary Pvt. Ltd (21 October 2024)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11, Contract Law, Contractual Disputes, Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants, Lease Agreements, Public Premises Act, 1971

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Act’s Primacy Over Public Premises Act in Lease Disputes LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Public Premises Act, 1971 overrides the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in disputes arising from lease agreements involving public premises. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law, Lease Dispute Case Name: Central Warehousing Corporation & Anr. vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Act’s Primacy Over Public Premises Act in Lease Disputes: Central Warehousing Corporation vs. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & Sanitary Pvt. Ltd (21 October 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Coal Procurement Dispute: Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. vs. EMTA Coal Limited & Anr. (20 May 2022)

/ Audit and Accounting, Breach of contract, CAG Report, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, Contract Law, Contracts Law: Contractual Disputes, Contractual Disputes, Hima Kohli, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana, Writ Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Coal Procurement Dispute Date of the Judgment: 20 May 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 5401-5404 of 2017 Judges: N.V. Ramana, CJI, Krishna Murari, J., Hima Kohli, J. Can a state-owned power corporation demand reimbursement from a coal supplier based on an audit report it initially contested? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Coal Procurement Dispute: Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. vs. EMTA Coal Limited & Anr. (20 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals Regarding Advocate Fee Dispute: Insurance Companies to Adhere to 2009 and 2014 GIPSA Fee Schedules

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Contract Law, Contractual Disputes, Judges, Public Interest Litigation

Insurance Companies’ Advocate Fee Dispute: Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can intervene in a contractual dispute between insurance companies and their empanelled advocates regarding fee payment through a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. [Respondent] (and other connected

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals Regarding Advocate Fee Dispute: Insurance Companies to Adhere to 2009 and 2014 GIPSA Fee Schedules Read Post »

Scroll to Top