Dispute Resolution

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of an ‘Arbitration Agreement’ in contract disputes: Solaris Chem Tech Industries Ltd vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply Board (2023)

/ Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 7, Contract Law, Contractual Agreements, Dispute Resolution, Impartiality of Arbitrator, Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board Act, 1973, Water Supply Agreements

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Agreements: Solaris Chem Tech Industries Ltd vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply Board (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a clause providing for dispute resolution by a departmental authority constitutes a valid arbitration agreement. CASE TYPE: Contractual Dispute, Arbitration Law Case Name: Solaris Chem Tech Industries Ltd vs. Assistant Executive Engineer Karnataka Urban Water […]

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of an ‘Arbitration Agreement’ in contract disputes: Solaris Chem Tech Industries Ltd vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply Board (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles arbitrability of disputes after settlement agreement in NTPC vs. SPML case (2023)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 11(6), Contract Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dispute Resolution, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Settlement Agreement

Supreme Court Settles Arbitrability of Disputes After Settlement Agreement in NTPC vs. SPML Case (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute is arbitrable after a settlement agreement has been executed and acted upon by the parties. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: NTPC LTD. vs. M/S SPML INFRA LTD. Judgment Date: 10 April 2023 Date of

Supreme Court settles arbitrability of disputes after settlement agreement in NTPC vs. SPML case (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under specific contract clauses: Emaar India Ltd. vs. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP (2022)

/ Appointment of Arbitrators, Arbitrability of Disputes, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration Law, Contract Law, Dispute Resolution, Interpretation of Clauses, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under specific contract clauses: Emaar India Ltd. vs. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a dispute falls under an arbitration clause or an exception clause within a contract. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Case Name: M/s. EMAAR INDIA LTD. VERSUS TARUN AGGARWAL PROJECTS LLP & ANR. [Judgment Date]: 30

Supreme Court clarifies arbitrability of disputes under specific contract clauses: Emaar India Ltd. vs. Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Agreement Requirements in Mahanadi Coalfields Case (25 July 2022)

/ A S Bopanna, Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 2(b), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 7, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 15, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dispute Resolution, Judges

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Agreement Requirements in Mahanadi Coalfields Case (25 July 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a clause titled “Settlement of Disputes/Arbitration” that provides for dispute resolution at the company level and refers to courts of law for other disputes constitutes a valid arbitration agreement. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd &

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Agreement Requirements in Mahanadi Coalfields Case (25 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes order passed by MSME Council for not following Arbitration Act: Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan (2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration Law, Arbitration Law with Section 34, Dispute Resolution, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, MSMED Act with Section 18, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court quashes order passed by MSME Council for not following Arbitration Act: Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) can pass an order for payment without initiating proper arbitration proceedings as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court quashes order passed by MSME Council for not following Arbitration Act: Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of arbitration under the Electricity Act in a dispute between a licensee and consumer: Hindustan Zinc vs. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam (2019)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Dispute Resolution, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 42, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86, Judges, Rohinton Fali Nariman, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Scope under Electricity Act: Hindustan Zinc vs. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam (2019) Date of the Judgment: December 04, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1148 Judges: Rohinton Fali Nariman, J., Aniruddha Bose, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a dispute between a power distribution company and a consumer be resolved through arbitration under the

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of arbitration under the Electricity Act in a dispute between a licensee and consumer: Hindustan Zinc vs. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs DGT&CP Haryana to Finalize Plot Allotment List: Okhla Enclave Case (2013)

/ Court-Directed Settlement, Dipak Misra, Dispute Resolution, Interim Orders, Judges, K. S. Radhakrishnan, Land Law, Land Law with Haryana Development & Regulation of Urban Areas Act 1975, Plot Allotment

Date of the Judgment: July 17, 2013 Judges: K. S. Radhakrishnan J. and Dipak Misra J. Can a court facilitate a resolution when multiple parties are entangled in a complex land dispute? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving plot allotments in Haryana. The court directed the Director General of

Supreme Court Directs DGT&CP Haryana to Finalize Plot Allotment List: Okhla Enclave Case (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top