Contract Law

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award of Interest: Union of India vs. M/s. Susaka Pvt. Ltd. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral tribunal can award interest on claims when the contract contains a clause prohibiting interest, and whether such an issue can be raised for the first time in appeal. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Union of India vs. M/s. Susaka Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Judgment Date: 08 December 2017 Date […]

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award of Interest: Union of India vs. M/s. Susaka Pvt. Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Toll Collection Contracts: Nasiruddin vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether contracts for the collection of “Tehbazari” and parking fees are considered leases under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and therefore subject to stamp duty as leases. CASE TYPE: Stamp Duty, Contract Law Case Name: Nasiruddin & Anr. Etc. vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh through Secretary & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 06 December

Supreme Court Clarifies Stamp Duty on Toll Collection Contracts: Nasiruddin vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order on personal property auction in housing dispute: Vinod Goyal vs. Vishranti City Residents Welfare Society (2017) INSC 1019 (29 November 2017)

Can a High Court order the auction of personal properties of partners in a developer firm to recover dues for a housing project? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case, concerning a dispute over infrastructure development in a residential colony. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s order, which

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order on personal property auction in housing dispute: Vinod Goyal vs. Vishranti City Residents Welfare Society (2017) INSC 1019 (29 November 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Auction for Mumbai Land Dispute: Jaykrishna Industries vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government body can privately negotiate the sale of public land after a public auction process has commenced and a change in land use has occurred. CASE TYPE: Civil (Land Auction Dispute) Case Name: Jaykrishna Industries Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others [Judgment Date]: November 13, 2017 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Auction for Mumbai Land Dispute: Jaykrishna Industries vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) Read Post »

Arbitration Award and Fraud: Supreme Court Addresses Public Policy in Venture Global vs. Tech Mahindra (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitration award can be set aside due to fraud and violation of public policy. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: Venture Global Engineering LLC vs. Tech Mahindra Ltd & Anr. Judgment Date: November 1, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: November 1, 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 934 Judges: J. Chelameswar and

Arbitration Award and Fraud: Supreme Court Addresses Public Policy in Venture Global vs. Tech Mahindra (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Inherent Powers of Electricity Regulatory Commissions in Tariff Disputes: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (25 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission can extend the control period of a tariff order by using its inherent powers. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law, Regulatory Law Case Name: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (India) Private Limited and Others Judgment Date: 25 October 2017 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Limits Inherent Powers of Electricity Regulatory Commissions in Tariff Disputes: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (25 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules against forfeiture of security deposit in auction case: Suresh Kumar Wadhwa vs. State of M.P. (25 October 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 25 October 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 923 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can a government body forfeit a security deposit when the terms of the auction were not fully disclosed? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a public auction of land.

Supreme Court rules against forfeiture of security deposit in auction case: Suresh Kumar Wadhwa vs. State of M.P. (25 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Basic Pay on Absorption: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Prativa Biswas (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether basic pay of employees can be reduced upon absorption into a new company, when the terms of absorption guaranteed protection of existing pay and emoluments. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. & Ors. vs. Prativa Biswas & Ors. Judgment Date: 11 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 11

Supreme Court Protects Basic Pay on Absorption: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Prativa Biswas (2017) Read Post »

Multiple Arbitral Tribunals Allowed: Supreme Court Decision in Duro Felguera vs. Gangavaram Port (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a single arbitral tribunal can be constituted for multiple contracts arising from the same project, or if separate tribunals are required for each contract. CASE TYPE: Arbitration Law Case Name: M/s. Duro Felguera, S.A. vs. M/s. Gangavaram Port Limited Judgment Date: 10 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10 October 2017

Multiple Arbitral Tribunals Allowed: Supreme Court Decision in Duro Felguera vs. Gangavaram Port (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement: Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy vs. Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao (2017)

Can a prior agreement to sell property be nullified by a subsequent sale? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a dispute over a house sale agreement. The Court examined the validity of competing agreements and the readiness of the parties to fulfill their obligations. This case highlights the importance

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement: Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy vs. Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies coal cost calculation in Power Purchase Agreement: Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) concerning the calculation of energy charges, specifically regarding the cost of coal. CASE TYPE: Contractual Dispute/Electricity Law. Case Name: Nabha Power Limited (NPL) vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) & Anr. Judgment Date: 05 October 2017 Date of the Judgment: 05 October 2017 Citation: 2017

Supreme Court clarifies coal cost calculation in Power Purchase Agreement: Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Specific Performance Suit Due to Lack of Ownership and Authority: Dharmabiri Rana vs. Pramod Kumar Sharma (2017) INSC 839

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for specific performance of a contract can be decreed when the defendants deny ownership of the property and the authority of the alleged power of attorney holder. CASE TYPE: Civil – Specific Performance of Contract Case Name: Dharmabiri Rana vs. Pramod Kumar Sharma (D) Thr. Lrs. & Anr. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Dismisses Specific Performance Suit Due to Lack of Ownership and Authority: Dharmabiri Rana vs. Pramod Kumar Sharma (2017) INSC 839 Read Post »

Scroll to Top