Contract Law

Supreme Court clarifies interest on delayed payments in arbitration: Chittaranjan Maity vs. Union of India (2017)

Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 849 Judges: J. Chelameswar, S. Abdul Nazeer Can an arbitrator award interest on delayed payments when the contract explicitly prohibits it? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case concerning a railway construction contract. The court clarified the extent of an […]

Supreme Court clarifies interest on delayed payments in arbitration: Chittaranjan Maity vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel in Recruitment Dispute: D. Sarojakumari vs. R. Helen Thilakom (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a candidate who participates in a selection process can later challenge the same process after being unsuccessful. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: D. Sarojakumari vs. R. Helen Thilakom & Ors. Judgment Date: September 13, 2017 Date of the Judgment: September 13, 2017. Citation: Not Available. Judges: Madan B. Lokur, J. and

Supreme Court Upholds Estoppel in Recruitment Dispute: D. Sarojakumari vs. R. Helen Thilakom (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Contractor Claims in Construction Dispute: National Building Construction vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)

Can a contractor claim additional payments for work when there’s a discrepancy in government-prescribed rates? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a civil appeal concerning a construction contract. The court upheld the High Court’s decision, which had rejected certain claims made by a contractor for extra work. This case clarifies how

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Contractor Claims in Construction Dispute: National Building Construction vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Claims for Extra Work in Construction Contract: National Building Construction vs. State of Maharashtra (23 August 2017)

Can a contractor claim additional payments for work beyond the original contract? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question in a case involving a construction contract dispute. The court examined whether a contractor was entitled to extra payments for stone pitching and water lead, ultimately ruling against the contractor. This judgment highlights the

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Claims for Extra Work in Construction Contract: National Building Construction vs. State of Maharashtra (23 August 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Driving License Requirements for Tractor-Trolleys in Accident Cases: Sant Lal vs. Rajesh & Ors. (2017) INSC 594 (3 July 2017)

Date of the Judgment: 3 July 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 594 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., Amitava Roy, J. Can a driver with a light motor vehicle (LMV) license legally operate a tractor attached to a goods-carrying trolley? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a motor accident claim case, clarifying the scope

Supreme Court Clarifies Driving License Requirements for Tractor-Trolleys in Accident Cases: Sant Lal vs. Rajesh & Ors. (2017) INSC 594 (3 July 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Gas Supply Dispute: Kamrup Industrial Gases Ltd. vs. Union of India (2017)

Can a court overturn an arbitral award because of non-production of documents, even if those documents were actually produced? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a dispute between Kamrup Industrial Gases Ltd. and the Union of India. This case revolves around a contract for the supply of industrial gases and the subsequent

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Gas Supply Dispute: Kamrup Industrial Gases Ltd. vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation on Hire Purchase Breach: Sundaram Finance vs. Noorjahan Beevi (2016)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the limitation period for filing a suit for recovery of dues in a hire-purchase agreement breach. CASE TYPE: Civil (Hire Purchase Agreement) Case Name: M/S. Sundaram Finance Limited vs. Noorjahan Beevi and Another [Judgment Date]: 29th June 2016 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 29th June 2016 Citation: (2016) INSC 657 Judges: Justice

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation on Hire Purchase Breach: Sundaram Finance vs. Noorjahan Beevi (2016) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Transfer Agreement for Public Utility: Narayanrao Jagobaji Gowande Public Trust vs. State of Maharashtra (2016)

Can a development agreement compel a landowner to transfer land reserved for public use without compensation? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving the Narayanrao Jagobaji Gowande Public Trust and the State of Maharashtra. The court examined whether such agreements are valid under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Transfer Agreement for Public Utility: Narayanrao Jagobaji Gowande Public Trust vs. State of Maharashtra (2016) Read Post »

Tender Process and CVC Guidelines: Supreme Court Decision in Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corp. Ltd. vs. Nirlac Chemicals (27 July 2017)

Can a tender process be invalidated if Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) guidelines are not followed? The Supreme Court of India addressed this key question in a dispute over a tender for polio vaccine bulk drugs. This case highlights the importance of transparency and adherence to guidelines in government procurement processes. The judgment was delivered by

Tender Process and CVC Guidelines: Supreme Court Decision in Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corp. Ltd. vs. Nirlac Chemicals (27 July 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs DGT&CP Haryana to Finalize Plot Allotment List: Okhla Enclave Case (2013)

Date of the Judgment: July 17, 2013 Judges: K. S. Radhakrishnan J. and Dipak Misra J. Can a court facilitate a resolution when multiple parties are entangled in a complex land dispute? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving plot allotments in Haryana. The court directed the Director General of

Supreme Court Directs DGT&CP Haryana to Finalize Plot Allotment List: Okhla Enclave Case (2013) Read Post »

Arbitration Clause Survives: Supreme Court Rules on Validity of Arbitration Agreements When Main Contract is Void in Real Estate Dispute (May 10, 2013)

Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2013 Judges: Altamas Kabir, CJI and Surinder Singh Nijjar, J. Citation: (2013) INSC 341 Can an arbitration agreement remain valid even if the main contract containing it is declared void? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a case involving a real estate development project. The

Arbitration Clause Survives: Supreme Court Rules on Validity of Arbitration Agreements When Main Contract is Void in Real Estate Dispute (May 10, 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cairn-Vedanta Deal, Dismissing PIL on ONGC’s Pre-emption Rights (2013)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) should have exercised its right of first refusal (RoFR) over the sale of Cairn India Limited (CIL) shares to Vedanta Resources Plc. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Contract Law, Corporate Law Case Name: Arun Kumar Agrawal vs. Union of India & Others Judgment Date: May

Supreme Court Upholds Cairn-Vedanta Deal, Dismissing PIL on ONGC’s Pre-emption Rights (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top