Supreme Court quashes High Court order reinstating cancelled tender: Level 9 Biz vs. HIMUDA (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can reinstate a cancelled tender based solely on statements by parties, ignoring prior findings of irregularities. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process, Public Procurement Case Name: Level 9 Biz Pvt. Ltd. vs. Himachal Pradesh […]
Supreme Court overturns High Court ruling on Aravana Prasadam: Travancore Devaswom Board vs. Ayyappa Spices (2024) INSC 183 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a public interest litigation (PIL) should be entertained when filed by a party with a vested interest in a tender process, and whether a religious board preparing and distributing prasadam qualifies as a “food
Supreme Court on Mineral Auction Rules: State of Jharkhand vs. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial Pvt. Ltd. (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 November 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 1010 Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, J., S.V.N. Bhatti, J. Can a state government be compelled to accept a single bid in a mineral auction if the first attempt at
Supreme Court Upholds BEST’s Tender Award to EVEY, Dismissing Tata Motors’ Challenge (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tender process can be challenged by a technically disqualified bidder and whether a successful bidder can rectify a minor clerical error in a non-essential document. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process Case Name: Tata Motors Limited vs. The
Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in Electric Bus Contract: Tata Motors vs. BEST (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court, after disqualifying a bidder in a tender process, should further investigate the eligibility of other bidders. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process Case Name: TATA Motors Limited vs. The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport
Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in Electric Bus Contract: Tata Motors vs. BEST (2023) Read Post »
Supreme Court overturns High Court order on lease cancellation: Debidutta Mohanty vs. Ranjan Kumar Pattnaik (2023) INSC 179 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a lease granted based on an invalid solvency certificate can be cancelled. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Lease Dispute Case Name: Debidutta Mohanty vs. Ranjan Kumar Pattnaik & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 3, 2023
Supreme Court Allows Road Project Completion, Emphasizes Minimal Interference in Tenders: N.G. Projects vs. Vinod Kumar Jain (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can interfere with a tender process and halt an infrastructure project based on minor deviations in bid documents. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Infrastructure Development, Tender Process. Case Name: M/S. N.G. Projects
Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the tender process of a foreign-funded project. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process, Foreign Funded Project Case Name: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited & Anr. Judgment Date: 31 January 2022 Introduction
Supreme Court Upholds Tender Disqualification: Agmatel India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Resoursys Telecom & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tender inviting authority’s interpretation of “same or similar category products” in a tender document can be challenged in court. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process Case Name: M/s Agmatel India Pvt. Ltd. vs. M/s Resoursys Telecom
Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection in Foreign Funded Project: National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Montecarlo Limited (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of judicial review in tender processes for foreign-funded projects. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, specifically relating to government tenders and foreign-funded projects. Case Name: National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs. Montecarlo Limited &
Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order on Gas Allocation: Vaibhavi Enterprise vs. Nobel Cera Coat (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can allow a writ petitioner to modify its bid in a tender process under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without giving an opportunity to other bidders. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Writ
Supreme Court Upholds Tender Rejection for Non-Disclosure: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. (2020) Date of the Judgment: December 08, 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 946 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J. and K.M. Joseph, J. Can a bidder suppress information about an ongoing criminal case related to their past projects when participating in
