Court Orders

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Fund Withdrawal in Jermyn Capital Case (17 May 2023)

/ Court Orders, Criminal Appeals, Criminal Law, Judges, Krishna Murari, Modification of Orders, Sanjay Kumar

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Fund Withdrawal in Jermyn Capital Case (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of a previous order regarding the withdrawal of funds. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal. Case Name: M/S. Jermyn Capital LLC Dubai vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. Judgment Date: 17 May 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 17 May 2023 […]

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Fund Withdrawal in Jermyn Capital Case (17 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Release of Mutual Funds in IL&FS Securities Case (11 April 2022)

/ Bank Guarantee, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Civil Law, Corporate Guarantee, Interim Orders, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Modification of Orders, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Securities Law, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Release of Mutual Funds in IL&FS Securities Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of conditions for release of mutual funds. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. Case Name: Securities and Exchange Board of India vs. IL&FS Securities Services Ltd. and Ors. Judgment Date: 11 April 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 11

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Release of Mutual Funds in IL&FS Securities Case (11 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Transfer of Funds in Cheque Bounce Case: M/S Kalamani Tex vs. P. Balasubramanian (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 362, Criminal Law, Judges, Modification of Orders, N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Transfer of Funds in Cheque Bounce Case: M/S Kalamani Tex vs. P. Balasubramanian (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of a court order regarding the transfer of funds. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: M/S Kalamani Tex and Anr. vs. P. Balasubramanian [Judgment Date]: 24 February 2021 Date of the Judgment: 24 February

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Transfer of Funds in Cheque Bounce Case: M/S Kalamani Tex vs. P. Balasubramanian (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Release in Motor Accident Case: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunil Kumar (2017)

/ Civil Procedure, Compensation Release, Court Orders, Judges, Motor Accident Law, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the location of deposited compensation for release to the claimant. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunil Kumar & Anr. [Judgment Date]: December 1, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 1, 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon’ble

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Release in Motor Accident Case: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunil Kumar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Order on State Bar Council Elections: Advocates with Pending Degree Verification Allowed to Vote (24 November 2017)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Bar Council Elections, Electoral Rolls, Judges, Modification of Orders, Provisional Participation, R.K. Agrawal, Supreme Court Orders, Verification of Law Degrees

Date of the Judgment: 24 November 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J. and Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. Can the election process of State Bar Councils be inclusive when there are delays in the verification of law degrees? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue by modifying its previous order to allow advocates

Supreme Court Modifies Order on State Bar Council Elections: Advocates with Pending Degree Verification Allowed to Vote (24 November 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kathuria Public Schools vs. Union of India (2016)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Anil R. Dave, Contempt of Court, Court Orders, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Non-Compliance of Court Orders, Shiva Kirti Singh, Undertaking to the Court

The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of land acquisition and possession in this case. The core legal question was whether the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) could take possession of land previously acquired, despite the appellant’s claims. This case highlights the importance of adhering to court orders and undertakings. Citation: This judgment is from

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kathuria Public Schools vs. Union of India (2016) Read Post »

Scroll to Top