Court Orders

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Fund Withdrawal in Jermyn Capital Case (17 May 2023)

/ Court Orders, Criminal Appeals, Criminal Law, Judges, Krishna Murari, Modification of Orders, Sanjay Kumar

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Fund Withdrawal in Jermyn Capital Case (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of a previous order regarding the withdrawal of funds. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal. Case Name: M/S. Jermyn Capital LLC Dubai vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. Judgment Date: 17 May 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 17 May 2023 […]

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Fund Withdrawal in Jermyn Capital Case (17 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Release in Motor Accident Case: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunil Kumar (2017)

/ Civil Procedure, Compensation Release, Court Orders, Judges, Motor Accident Law, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the location of deposited compensation for release to the claimant. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunil Kumar & Anr. [Judgment Date]: December 1, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 1, 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon’ble

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation Release in Motor Accident Case: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Sunil Kumar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles ACP Scheme applicability for retained employees in Haryana State Small Industries Case (24 April 2017)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, Court Orders, Judges, Kurian Joseph, R. Banumathi, Service Law

Can employees, retained by court order, be considered surplus and denied benefits under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving the Haryana State Small Industries and Export Corporation Limited. This judgment clarifies the position of employees retained due to court orders, ensuring they

Supreme Court settles ACP Scheme applicability for retained employees in Haryana State Small Industries Case (24 April 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kathuria Public Schools vs. Union of India (2016)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Anil R. Dave, Contempt of Court, Court Orders, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Non-Compliance of Court Orders, Shiva Kirti Singh, Undertaking to the Court

The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of land acquisition and possession in this case. The core legal question was whether the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) could take possession of land previously acquired, despite the appellant’s claims. This case highlights the importance of adhering to court orders and undertakings. Citation: This judgment is from

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Kathuria Public Schools vs. Union of India (2016) Read Post »

Scroll to Top