Customs Act, 1962 with Section 28

Supreme Court clarifies “Importer” definition under Customs Act: Nalin Choksey vs. Commissioner of Customs (2024)

Supreme Court clarifies “Importer” definition under Customs Act: Nalin Choksey vs. Commissioner of Customs (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Definition of “importer” under the Customs Act, 1962, and liability of subsequent purchasers for customs duty. CASE TYPE: Customs Law Case Name: Nalin Choksey vs. The Commissioner of Customs, Kochi [Judgment Date]: 27 November 2024 Date of the […]

Supreme Court clarifies “Importer” definition under Customs Act: Nalin Choksey vs. Commissioner of Customs (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of DRI Officers in Customs Duty Recovery: Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. (2024)

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of DRI Officers in Customs Duty Recovery: Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of authority of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) officers to issue show cause notices for customs duty recovery. CASE TYPE: Customs Law, Tax Law Case Name: Commissioner of Customs vs. M/s Canon

Supreme Court Clarifies Powers of DRI Officers in Customs Duty Recovery: Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “Proper Officer” for Customs Duty Recovery: Canon India vs. Commissioner of Customs (2021)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Proper Officer” for Customs Duty Recovery: Canon India vs. Commissioner of Customs (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of the “proper officer” authorized to issue a notice for recovery of customs duty under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962. CASE TYPE: Customs Law Case Name: M/s Canon India Private Limited vs. Commissioner of

Supreme Court clarifies “Proper Officer” for Customs Duty Recovery: Canon India vs. Commissioner of Customs (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies sequential application of Customs Valuation Rules in import valuation: Anil Kumar Anand vs. Commissioner of Customs (2019) INSC 352

Supreme Court clarifies sequential application of Customs Valuation Rules in import valuation: Anil Kumar Anand vs. Commissioner of Customs (2019) INSC 352 Date of the Judgment: April 22, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 352 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Hemant Gupta, J. Can customs authorities bypass the prescribed sequence of valuation methods when assessing import duties?

Supreme Court clarifies sequential application of Customs Valuation Rules in import valuation: Anil Kumar Anand vs. Commissioner of Customs (2019) INSC 352 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the conditions for invoking extended limitation period under Section 28 of the Customs Act in duty evasion cases: Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs (07 August 2006)

Date of the Judgment: 07 August 2006 Citation: [Not Available in Source Text] Judges: Ashok Bhan, J. and Markandey Katju, J. When can customs authorities use a longer period to demand unpaid duties? The Supreme Court addressed this important question in the case of Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs. The core

Supreme Court clarifies the conditions for invoking extended limitation period under Section 28 of the Customs Act in duty evasion cases: Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs (07 August 2006) Read Post »

Scroll to Top