Supreme Court Restores Anti-Dumping Duty Demand on SBR Imports: Commissioner of Customs vs. Ballarpur Industries (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether anti-dumping duty is applicable on imported Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR) when the importer claims it to be a different product (Latex) and the customs department claims it to be SBR based on test reports. CASE TYPE: […]
LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of anti-dumping duty on imported stainless steel flat products based on width specifications and tolerance limits. CASE TYPE: Customs Law/ Anti-Dumping Duty Case Name: Commissioner of Customs (Export) Nhava Sheva vs. M/s. Mascot International [Judgment Date]: July 3, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 3, 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 606 Judges: A.K.
LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the extension of anti-dumping duty can be done after the expiry of the original notification period and whether the initiation of sunset review is valid if the notification is made public after the expiry of the original notification. CASE TYPE: Anti-Dumping Law Case Name: Union of India and Another vs. M/s. Kumho
Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 10, 2008 Judges: Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justice B. Sudershan Reddy When is an imported article considered similar enough to a domestic product to warrant anti-dumping duties? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving the interpretation of “like article” under the Customs Tariff Act.
