Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

Supreme Court quashes summoning order for drug manufacturing: JM Laboratories vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025)

Date of the Judgment: January 30, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 127 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Augustine George Masih, J. Can a Magistrate issue a summons to appear in court without providing any reasons? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a case concerning the manufacturing of substandard drugs. The court […]

Supreme Court quashes summoning order for drug manufacturing: JM Laboratories vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of ‘manufacture’ under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act in INOX Air Products vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025) INSC 128 (30 January 2025)

LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of the term “manufacture” under Section 3(f) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and its implications on the sale of drugs between licensed manufacturers. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Case Name: INOX Air Products Limited vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh. Judgment Date: 30 January 2025 Introduction Date

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of ‘manufacture’ under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act in INOX Air Products vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025) INSC 128 (30 January 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence for Non-Disclosure of Drug Manufacturer: Palani vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2024)

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence for Non-Disclosure of Drug Manufacturer: Palani vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sentence of imprisonment is justified for a doctor who failed to disclose the name of the manufacturer of recovered drugs, especially when the intent to sell or distribute those drugs was not proven. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence for Non-Disclosure of Drug Manufacturer: Palani vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Classifies Medicated Talcum Powder as Cosmetic Under Kerala and Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Laws (2023)

Supreme Court Classifies Medicated Talcum Powder as Cosmetic Under Kerala and Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Laws (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Classification of medicated talcum powder under sales tax laws. CASE TYPE: Sales Tax Law Case Name: HEINZ INDIA LIMITED vs. THE STATE OF KERELA & M/s Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs. State of Tamil Nadu [Judgment

Supreme Court Classifies Medicated Talcum Powder as Cosmetic Under Kerala and Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Laws (2023) Read Post »

Medicated Talcum Powder Classified as Cosmetic: Supreme Court Decision on KGST and TNGST Acts (2023)

Supreme Court Classifies Medicated Talcum Powder as Cosmetic under KGST and TNGST Acts (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Classification of medicated talcum powder under sales tax laws. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: HEINZ INDIA LIMITED vs. THE STATE OF KERELA and M/s Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Judgment Date: May 4,

Medicated Talcum Powder Classified as Cosmetic: Supreme Court Decision on KGST and TNGST Acts (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds ‘Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil’ as Medicament Under Chapter 30: Commissioner of Customs vs. Ashwani Homeo Pharmacy (2023) INSC 4832 (03 May 2023)

Supreme Court Upholds ‘Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil’ as Medicament Under Chapter 30 Date of the Judgment: 03 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 4832 Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, J., Vikram Nath, J. Can a product containing homeopathic medicines, applied topically, be classified as a cosmetic or a medicament? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this

Supreme Court Upholds ‘Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil’ as Medicament Under Chapter 30: Commissioner of Customs vs. Ashwani Homeo Pharmacy (2023) INSC 4832 (03 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Classification of Homeopathic Hair Oil as Medicament: Commissioner of Customs vs. Ashwani Homeo Pharmacy (2023)

Supreme Court Upholds Classification of Homeopathic Hair Oil as Medicament: Commissioner of Customs vs. Ashwani Homeo Pharmacy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a homeopathic hair oil should be classified as a medicament or a cosmetic for tax purposes. CASE TYPE: Central Excise Law Case Name: Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Hyderabad vs. Ashwani

Supreme Court Upholds Classification of Homeopathic Hair Oil as Medicament: Commissioner of Customs vs. Ashwani Homeo Pharmacy (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings against doctor for stocking medicines: S. Athilakshmi vs. State (2023)

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings against doctor for stocking medicines: S. Athilakshmi vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a registered medical practitioner stocking medicines for distribution to her own patients amounts to “stocking for sale” under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: S. Athilakshmi vs. The State Rep. by

Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings against doctor for stocking medicines: S. Athilakshmi vs. State (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies drug stocking rules for doctors: S. Athilakshmi vs. State (2023)

Supreme Court clarifies drug stocking rules for doctors: S. Athilakshmi vs. State (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a registered medical practitioner stocking small quantities of medicines for their patients amounts to “stocking for sale” under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law Case Name: S. Athilakshmi vs. The State Rep. by the Drugs

Supreme Court clarifies drug stocking rules for doctors: S. Athilakshmi vs. State (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes criminal complaint against chemical traders for alleged drug violations: Hasmukhlal D. Vora vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) INSC 1084 (16 December 2022)

Supreme Court quashes criminal complaint against chemical traders for alleged drug violations: Hasmukhlal D. Vora vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) INSC 1084 (16 December 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a criminal complaint under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 can be sustained against a trader of a substance that is classified as a food ingredient

Supreme Court quashes criminal complaint against chemical traders for alleged drug violations: Hasmukhlal D. Vora vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2022) INSC 1084 (16 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the legality of vaccine mandates and the importance of data transparency in COVID-19 cases (2 May 2022)

Supreme Court Clarifies Vaccine Mandates and Data Transparency in COVID-19 Case (2 May 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether vaccine mandates infringe upon individual rights and the extent of transparency required in clinical trial data. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation, Constitutional Law Case Name: Jacob Puliyel vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 2 May 2022

Supreme Court clarifies the legality of vaccine mandates and the importance of data transparency in COVID-19 cases (2 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes indefinite blacklisting for misbranding: Vetindia Pharmaceuticals vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) INSC 464

Supreme Court quashes indefinite blacklisting for misbranding: Vetindia Pharmaceuticals vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) INSC 464 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an indefinite blacklisting order for a minor misbranding error, without a specific show cause notice, is valid. CASE TYPE: Contract Law/ Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Limited vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

Supreme Court quashes indefinite blacklisting for misbranding: Vetindia Pharmaceuticals vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) INSC 464 Read Post »

Scroll to Top