Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with Section 28

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence for Non-Disclosure of Drug Manufacturer: Palani vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2024)

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence for Non-Disclosure of Drug Manufacturer: Palani vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sentence of imprisonment is justified for a doctor who failed to disclose the name of the manufacturer of recovered drugs, especially when the intent to sell or distribute those drugs was not proven. CASE TYPE: […]

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence for Non-Disclosure of Drug Manufacturer: Palani vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Drug Sale Without License: State vs. Manimaran (2018)

November 30, 2018 / Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with Section 18(c), Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with Section 27(b)(ii), Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with Section 28, Indian Evidence Act, Indian Evidence Act with Section 62, Indira Banerjee, Judges, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Drug Sale Without License: State vs. Manimaran (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person can be convicted for selling drugs without a valid license based on their admission, even if the previous owners of the shop are not examined as witnesses. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Drug Sale Without License: State vs. Manimaran (2018) Read Post »