Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 14

Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Area for Electricity Distribution Licenses: Jindal Steel vs. Chhattisgarh State (29 September 2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Area of Supply, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 243(Q), Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 14, Judges, Licensing

Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Area for Electricity Distribution Licenses: Jindal Steel vs. Chhattisgarh State (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “area of supply” for electricity distribution licenses. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Regulatory Law. Case Name: M/s. Jindal Steel and Power Limited vs. The Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 29 September 2022 Introduction […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Area for Electricity Distribution Licenses: Jindal Steel vs. Chhattisgarh State (29 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Special Status in Tariff Determination: Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. vs. Damodar Valley Corporation (23 July 2018)

/ Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 20, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 40, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 14, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 174, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 61, Finance, Accounts and Audit, Judges, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Special Status in Tariff Determination: Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. vs. Damodar Valley Corporation (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) is governed by the Electricity Act, 2003, or if the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948, continues to apply for tariff determination. CASE TYPE: Electricity Tariff Regulation. Case Name: Bhaskar

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Special Status in Tariff Determination: Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. vs. Damodar Valley Corporation (23 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination: A Review of Electricity Act, 2003 (23 July 2018)

/ Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 20, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 40, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 14, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 174, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 61, Judges, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination: A Review of Electricity Act, 2003 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) is governed by the Electricity Act, 2003 or the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 for tariff determination. CASE TYPE: Electricity Tariff Regulation Case Name: Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. Etc. Etc. vs. Damodar Valley Corporation &

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination: A Review of Electricity Act, 2003 (23 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination, Clarifying the Interplay Between the Electricity Act and the DVC Act (23 July 2018)

/ Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 20, Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 with Section 40, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 14, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 174, Judges, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination: A Detailed Analysis Date of the Judgment: 23 July 2018 Citation: [Not Available in the Source] Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J, R. Banumathi, J. Can a regulatory body’s tariff regulations override specific provisions of a parent act? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case concerning

Supreme Court Upholds DVC’s Tariff Determination, Clarifying the Interplay Between the Electricity Act and the DVC Act (23 July 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top