Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 42

Supreme Court Clarifies Electricity Tariff for Inadvertent Drawal in Open Access Agreements: Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Commercial Agreements, Contract Law, Contract Law with Retrospective Application, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 125, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 42, Judges, Open Access

Supreme Court Clarifies Electricity Tariff for Inadvertent Drawal: Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. (2022) Date of the Judgment: February 17, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 170 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Abhay S. Oka Can changes in electricity tariffs for inadvertent drawal under open access agreements be applied retrospectively? The Supreme […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Electricity Tariff for Inadvertent Drawal in Open Access Agreements: Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules captive power users exempt from additional surcharge: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. JSW Steel Limited & Ors. (10 December 2021)

/ Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 2(15), Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 42, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 9, Judges, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Judgement on Additional Surcharge for Captive Power Users LEGAL ISSUE: Whether captive power consumers are liable to pay additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law Case Name: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. JSW Steel Limited & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 10 December 2021 Introduction

Supreme Court rules captive power users exempt from additional surcharge: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. JSW Steel Limited & Ors. (10 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of arbitration under the Electricity Act in a dispute between a licensee and consumer: Hindustan Zinc vs. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam (2019)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 37, Dispute Resolution, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 42, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86, Judges, Rohinton Fali Nariman, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitration Scope under Electricity Act: Hindustan Zinc vs. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam (2019) Date of the Judgment: December 04, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1148 Judges: Rohinton Fali Nariman, J., Aniruddha Bose, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a dispute between a power distribution company and a consumer be resolved through arbitration under the

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of arbitration under the Electricity Act in a dispute between a licensee and consumer: Hindustan Zinc vs. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top