Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 56

Supreme Court clarifies liability for electricity dues of previous owners on auction purchasers: K C Ninan vs. Kerala State Electricity Board (2023) INSC 478 (19 May 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 43, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 50, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 56, Hima Kohli, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Supreme Court Clarifies Electricity Dues Liability for Auction Purchasers Date of the Judgment: 19 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 478 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, Hima Kohli, J, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. Can auction purchasers be held liable for the unpaid electricity dues of previous owners? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial […]

Supreme Court clarifies liability for electricity dues of previous owners on auction purchasers: K C Ninan vs. Kerala State Electricity Board (2023) INSC 478 (19 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Electricity Dues Recovery Despite Billing Error: Prem Cottex vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (2021)

/ Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(g), Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 56, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 17(1)(c), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Electricity Dues Recovery Despite Billing Error: Prem Cottex vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (2021) Date of the Judgment: October 5, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 695 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can an electricity company recover dues from a consumer after discovering a billing error, even if it’s been

Supreme Court Upholds Electricity Dues Recovery Despite Billing Error: Prem Cottex vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles liability for previous electricity dues in auction sales: Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited vs. Srigdhaa Beverages (2020) INSC 368

/ Auction Sales, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 56, Electricity Dues, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, SARFAESI Act, 2002, Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002

Supreme Court settles liability for previous electricity dues in auction sales: Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited vs. Srigdhaa Beverages (2020) INSC 368 Date of the Judgment: June 01, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 368 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. and K.M. Joseph, J. Can an auction purchaser be held liable for the previous electricity

Supreme Court settles liability for previous electricity dues in auction sales: Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited vs. Srigdhaa Beverages (2020) INSC 368 Read Post »

Supreme Court settles dispute on electricity disconnection and minimum guarantee charges: Bihar State Electricity Board vs. M/S Iceberg Industries Ltd. (27 April 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Consumer Grievance Redressal, Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Consumer Law, Consumer Rights, Deepak Gupta, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 2(15), Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 56, Judges

Supreme Court settles dispute on electricity disconnection and minimum guarantee charges: Bihar State Electricity Board vs. M/S Iceberg Industries Ltd. (2020) Date of the Judgment: 27 April 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 348 Judges: Deepak Gupta, J., Aniruddha Bose, J. Can an electricity board disconnect power supply to a consumer for non-payment of dues, even if

Supreme Court settles dispute on electricity disconnection and minimum guarantee charges: Bihar State Electricity Board vs. M/S Iceberg Industries Ltd. (27 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of “first due” under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 in cases of incorrect billing: Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited & Anr. vs. Rahamatullah Khan alias Rahamjulla (18 February 2020)

/ Consumer Law, Consumer Rights, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 56, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Limitation Law, Limitation Period, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies “First Due” Date Under Electricity Act: Ajmer Vidyut Nigam vs. Rahamatullah Khan (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “first due” in Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003, concerning the limitation period for disconnection of electricity supply due to non-payment of dues. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Consumer Law. Case Name: Assistant Engineer (D1),

Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of “first due” under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 in cases of incorrect billing: Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited & Anr. vs. Rahamatullah Khan alias Rahamjulla (18 February 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top