Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(b)

Supreme Court Clarifies Tariff Adoption for Waste-to-Energy Projects: Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Gagan Narang (2025)

/ B.R. Gavai, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 175, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 63, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(b), Judges, K.V. Viswanathan, Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 with Rule 15, Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 with Rule 9

Date of the Judgment: January 2, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 2 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and K.V. Viswanathan, J. Can a municipal corporation, responsible for waste management, approach the electricity regulatory commission for tariff adoption of a waste-to-energy project? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question. This case clarifies whether entities other than […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Tariff Adoption for Waste-to-Energy Projects: Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Gagan Narang (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Power to Reject Misaligned Bids in Electricity Procurement: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 63, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(b)

Supreme Court Upholds Power to Reject Misaligned Bids in Electricity Procurement: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State Electricity Regulatory Commission can reject a bid for electricity procurement if the quoted tariff is not aligned with prevailing market prices, even after a transparent bidding process.

Supreme Court Upholds Power to Reject Misaligned Bids in Electricity Procurement: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State Commission’s Authority in Power Purchase Agreements: Southern Power Distribution Company Limited vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (2022)

/ Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 with Section 21, B.R. Gavai, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 62, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(b), Judges, L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Upholds State Commission’s Authority in Power Purchase Agreements: Southern Power Distribution Company Limited vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (2022) Date of the Judgment: February 2, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 101 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and B.R. Gavai, J. Can a power distribution company withdraw from a power purchase agreement (PPA) after

Supreme Court Upholds State Commission’s Authority in Power Purchase Agreements: Southern Power Distribution Company Limited vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreement: Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Ltd. (2 February 2022)

/ Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reform Act, 1998 with Section 21, B.R. Gavai, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86(1)(b), Judges, L. Nageswara Rao

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreement: Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Distribution Company can withdraw from a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) after initially agreeing to it and after the power plant has become operational. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law, Regulatory Law. Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreement: Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. vs. Hinduja National Power Corporation Ltd. (2 February 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top