Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998

Supreme Court Upholds MSEB’s Authority on Captive Power Plant Policy Before MERC’s Formation: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. Union of India (28 February 2020)

/ Arun Mishra, B.R. Gavai, Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998, Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 with Section 22(2), Electricity Supply Act, 1948, Electricity Supply Act, 1948 with Section 44, Electricity Supply Act, 1948 with Section 49, Electricity Supply Act, 1948 with Section 79(j), Judges, M.R. Shah, Powers of Regulatory Bodies

Supreme Court Upholds MSEB’s Authority on Captive Power Plant Policy Before MERC’s Formation Date of the Judgment: 28 February 2020 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4304 of 2007 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., M.R. Shah, J., B.R. Gavai, J. Can a regulatory body invalidate policy decisions made by a state electricity board before the body’s own establishment? […]

Supreme Court Upholds MSEB’s Authority on Captive Power Plant Policy Before MERC’s Formation: Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. Union of India (28 February 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies FERV Apportionment in Power Tariffs: Power Grid Corporation vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Co. (2019)

/ Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998, Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 with Regulation 1.13(a), Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 with Regulations 1.3 and 1.7, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, N.V. Ramana, Tariff Regulations, 2001

Supreme Court on Foreign Exchange Rate Variation (FERV) Apportionment in Power Tariffs LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Foreign Exchange Rate Variation (FERV) should be apportioned between debt and equity after being added to the capital cost in power tariffs. CASE TYPE: Electricity Regulatory Law Case Name: Power Grid Corporation of India vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution

Supreme Court clarifies FERV Apportionment in Power Tariffs: Power Grid Corporation vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Co. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds 23:77 Standby Charge Ratio Between Tata Power and Adani Electricity: Civil Appeal (2 May 2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998, Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 with Section 29(3), Judges, S. Abdul Nazeer, Standby Charges, Tariff Determination

Supreme Court Upholds 23:77 Standby Charge Ratio Between Tata Power and Adani Electricity Date of the Judgment: 2 May 2019 The Supreme Court of India addressed a long-standing dispute regarding the sharing of standby charges between Tata Power Company Ltd. (TPC) and Adani Electricity Mumbai Ltd. (formerly Reliance Energy Limited). The core issue revolved around

Supreme Court Upholds 23:77 Standby Charge Ratio Between Tata Power and Adani Electricity: Civil Appeal (2 May 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top