Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 with Section 79(c)

Supreme Court Clarifies Disciplinary Inquiry Rules for Minor Penalties: D.H.B.V.N.L. vs. Yashvir Singh Gulia (30 July 2013)

/ Disciplinary Inquiry, Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 with Section 79(c), Haryana State Electricity Board Employees (Punishment & Appeal) Regulations, 1990, Judges, K. S. Radhakrishnan, Minor Penalty, Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Service Law

Date of the Judgment: 30 July 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 536 Judges: K. S. Radhakrishnan, J. and Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J. Can a disciplinary authority impose a minor penalty after issuing a charge-sheet for a major penalty, without conducting a full departmental inquiry? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Disciplinary Inquiry Rules for Minor Penalties: D.H.B.V.N.L. vs. Yashvir Singh Gulia (30 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles promotion criteria for Superintending Engineers: U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Ayodhya Prasad Mishra (2008)

/ C.K. Thakker, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 with Section 79(c), Fundamental Rights, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed a critical question regarding promotions within the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation: Should promotions to the post of Superintending Engineer be based on merit or seniority? This issue arose from a dispute where an Executive Engineer, despite being placed in Category I

Supreme Court settles promotion criteria for Superintending Engineers: U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Ayodhya Prasad Mishra (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top