Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Employees’ Provident Fund Act to umbrella manufacturing units (2023)

/ Employees' Provident Fund Act, 1952, Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 1(3), Labour Law

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Employees’ Provident Fund Act to umbrella manufacturing units (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 to establishments involved in manufacturing and selling umbrellas. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Thankamma Baby vs. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Kochi, Kerala Judgment Date: 7 November […]

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of Employees’ Provident Fund Act to umbrella manufacturing units (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles definition of “employee” under Employees’ Provident Fund Act for home-based garment workers: Provident Fund Office vs. Godavari Garments Ltd. (24 July 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Definition of Employee, Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 2(f), Indu Malhotra, Judges, Social Security Law

Supreme Court Clarifies “Employee” Definition under EPF Act for Home-Based Garment Workers Date of the Judgment: 24 July 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 721 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can home-based workers, specifically women engaged in garment stitching, be considered “employees” under the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act)?

Supreme Court settles definition of “employee” under Employees’ Provident Fund Act for home-based garment workers: Provident Fund Office vs. Godavari Garments Ltd. (24 July 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top