Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952

Supreme Court Upholds EPF Act Application to Educational Institutions Run by Same Society: M/s Mathosri Manikbai Kothari College of Visual Arts vs. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (2023) INSC 909 (12 October 2023)

/ Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 1(3)(b), Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 7-A, EPF Act Coverage

Supreme Court Upholds EPF Act Application to Educational Institutions Run by Same Society LEGAL ISSUE: Whether two educational institutions managed by the same society can be clubbed together for the purpose of coverage under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act). CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: M/s Mathosri Manikbai Kothari […]

Supreme Court Upholds EPF Act Application to Educational Institutions Run by Same Society: M/s Mathosri Manikbai Kothari College of Visual Arts vs. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (2023) INSC 909 (12 October 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies definition of “Excluded Employee” under Employees’ Provident Funds Act: Modern Transportation vs. EPFO (26 March 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 17, Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 with Section 2(f), Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 with Paragraph 2(f), Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 with Paragraph 69(1), Exempted Employee, Judges, Membership of Fund

Supreme Court Clarifies “Excluded Employee” Definition Under EPF Act: Modern Transportation vs. EPFO (2019) Date of the Judgment: 26 March 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 293 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. and Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can retired employees who have withdrawn their full provident fund benefits from their previous employer be considered “excluded employees” when re-employed

Supreme Court clarifies definition of “Excluded Employee” under Employees’ Provident Funds Act: Modern Transportation vs. EPFO (26 March 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top