Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952

Supreme Court Upholds EPF Applicability to Security Agencies: Panther Security vs. EPFO (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds EPF Applicability to Security Agencies: Panther Security vs. EPFO (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether private security agencies are covered under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: M/S. PANTHER SECURITY SERVICE PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION AND ANOTHER Judgment Date: 02 December […]

Supreme Court Upholds EPF Applicability to Security Agencies: Panther Security vs. EPFO (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court mandates Provident Fund for Contractual Employees of Pawan Hans: Pawan Hans Ltd. vs. Aviation Karmachari Sanghatana (2020)

Supreme Court mandates Provident Fund for Contractual Employees of Pawan Hans: Pawan Hans Ltd. vs. Aviation Karmachari Sanghatana (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether contractual employees are entitled to provident fund benefits under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 or the company’s own trust regulations. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: M/S. PAWAN HANS

Supreme Court mandates Provident Fund for Contractual Employees of Pawan Hans: Pawan Hans Ltd. vs. Aviation Karmachari Sanghatana (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of ‘establishment’ for EPF Act exemption: Shree Vishal Printers vs. RPFC (2019)

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of ‘establishment’ for EPF Act exemption: Shree Vishal Printers vs. RPFC (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether multiple entities can be considered a single ‘establishment’ under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, thereby disqualifying them from exemption. CASE TYPE: Labour Law (Employees’ Provident Fund) Case Name: M/s. Shree Vishal

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of ‘establishment’ for EPF Act exemption: Shree Vishal Printers vs. RPFC (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top